Comparison Overview

Action Letter, Inc.

VS

Phenix Label Company, Inc.

Action Letter, Inc.

11 Elm Court, Stamford, CT, 06902, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.actionletter.com

PRINT • DIRECT MAIL • FULFILLMENT • STORAGE Print offset or digital everything from business cards to letterhead, envelopes, postcards, brochures, direct mailers. Mail all your letters, promotions to your distribution list, EDDM® or we can get you targeted mailing list. Pack your sample product, giveaways, influencer marketing, product distribution and promotion. Ship domestic or international. Follow us / Like us in social media: Facebook, Twitter and Instagram @actionletter Contact us: NY (212) 683-2400 CT (203) 3232466 US (877) 683-2400 [email protected] www.actionletter.com

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Phenix Label Company, Inc.

11610 S Alden St, Olathe, 66062, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.phenixlabel.com

Phenix Label is a 5th generation family-owned label and packaging partner delivering innovative solutions that help brands stand out and scale. For 130 years, we’ve helped food & beverage, personal care, pharmaceutical, household, and automotive brands bring their products to market with precision, speed, and impact. From labels and flexible packaging to RFID smart labeling, our team makes packaging one less thing you have to worry about. What sets us apart? Dedicated customer teams, in-house R&D, sustainability leadership, and unmatched service that simplifies your packaging process while supporting your bottom line. Phenix Label — Better Service. Bottom Line.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/action-letter-inc-.jpeg
Action Letter, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phenix-label.jpeg
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Action Letter, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Action Letter, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phenix Label Company, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Action Letter, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Action Letter, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phenix Label Company, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phenix Label Company, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/action-letter-inc-.jpeg
Action Letter, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phenix-label.jpeg
Phenix Label Company, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Action Letter, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Phenix Label Company, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Action Letter, Inc. company.

In the current year, Phenix Label Company, Inc. company and Action Letter, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor Action Letter, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor Action Letter, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phenix Label Company, Inc. company nor Action Letter, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. company nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phenix Label Company, Inc. company employs more people globally than Action Letter, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Action Letter, Inc. nor Phenix Label Company, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References