Comparison Overview

Actevate Pty Ltd

VS

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)

Actevate Pty Ltd

Level 13, 447 Kent Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Actevate Pty Ltd is a national corporate health and injury management provider established in 2006. Over the past 16 years, we've partnered with some of Australia's largest companies to enhance employee health, performance and productivity. At Actevate, we care about results and we pride ourselves on creating fully tailored solutions designed to foster happier, healthier and more productive workplaces. Our expert team of health professionals come from diverse backgrounds, and are united by a deep understanding of corporate health and wellness.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)

26 Mercy St, Bendigo, Victoria, AU, 3550
Last Update: 2025-11-26

GPSA serves as Australia’s primary organization for GP/RG supervisors and training practices, representing approximately 10,000 members. We support supervision in its various forms, prioritizing support for supervisors, practice managers, and training practices developing future general practitioners (GPs) and rural generalists (RGs). Through active engagement with our members, we advocate for enhanced training conditions, emphasizing sustainability and professional fulfillment as pivotal factors in providing best practice supervision and attracting more doctors to General Practice. GPSA is committed to fostering the enthusiasm that propels the GP training sector forward, offering service, support, research, innovation, education, and advocacy. Our vision is to champion a thriving GP training sector that is cohesive, duly acknowledged, rewarded, and respected as the cornerstone of Australia's healthcare system.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actevate-pty-ltd.jpeg
Actevate Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpsupervisorsaustralia.jpeg
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Actevate Pty Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Actevate Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) in 2025.

Incident History — Actevate Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Actevate Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/actevate-pty-ltd.jpeg
Actevate Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gpsupervisorsaustralia.jpeg
General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Actevate Pty Ltd company and General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Actevate Pty Ltd company.

In the current year, General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company and Actevate Pty Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company nor Actevate Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company nor Actevate Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company nor Actevate Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd company nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd company nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Actevate Pty Ltd company employs more people globally than General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Actevate Pty Ltd nor General Practice Supervision Australia (GPSA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H