Comparison Overview

ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise

VS

Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company

ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise

ZI QUEYRIES SUD, BORDEAUX, undefined, 33100, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.acsd.fr

Chez ACSD Print & Service, nous prenons en main vos travaux d’impression de A à Z. Une entreprise active depuis 1983 Nous bénéficions d’une longue expérience et d’un savoir-faire à toute épreuve dans la réalisation d’impression numérique et offset. Nous pouvons imprimer vos créations sur toutes sortes de supports, petits et grands formats, souples et rigides. Manque de temps ou de créativité ? Nos graphistes vous proposeront des solutions créatives et personnalisées pour les mises en pages et visuels de vos documents. Vous souhaitez vous renseigner ? Un service ne figure pas dans le catalogue ? N’hésitez pas à joindre notre équipe qui sera à votre écoute et vous conseillera sur la meilleure solution.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company

2643 W Chicago Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60622, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.andresimaging.com

Andres Imaging & Graphics brings a wealth of creative expertise and field experience to graphic branded environments. Andres has a long history in complete customer satisfaction in the Retail, Corporate, Museum, Exhibit, Event, and Hospitality markets. Our continued goal is to understand your business and to transform your environment into an integrated and engaging brand experience.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acsd-print-&-services.jpeg
ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andres-imaging-&-graphics.jpeg
Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company in 2025.

Incident History — ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acsd-print-&-services.jpeg
ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andres-imaging-&-graphics.jpeg
Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company.

In the current year, Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company and ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company nor ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company nor ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company nor ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise company employs more people globally than Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ACSD, imprimerie bordelaise nor Andres Imaging & Graphics, a Moss Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References