Comparison Overview

Acme Printing Company

VS

Bayard Printing Group

Acme Printing Company

1100 East Main Street, Morristown, 37814, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17

Acme Printing is the market leader in providing our customers with top-of-the-line digital and offset commercial printing, graphic design, finishing, labels, wide format signs and banners, and now promotional items. Our customers know that even with the proliferation of digital media, printed items such as rack cards, brochures, business cards, and flyers are extremely effective in getting their message out to their marketplace. We offer fast turnaround times, lower costs and the ability to print smaller quantities that allow our customers to target more specific audiences.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bayard Printing Group

1 Maynard Street, Williamsport, PA, US, 17701
Last Update: 2025-12-11

The product of the merger of Webb Communications and Reed Hann Litho of Williamsport, PA and Unigraphic Color Corporation of Plymouth, PA, Bayard Printing is a full service commercial printer and direct mail house serving the Northeast US from multiple locations in Northeast and Central PA. The group produces quality print products by way of high volume heat-set web printing, mid to high volume sheetfed offset printing and short run on-demand digital printing. This exceptionally broad range of production capabilities allows us to efficiently serve the needs of large businesses, small businesses, and individual consumers. In addition to our print capabilities, we also provide a wide range of bulk mailing and fulfillment services. For corporate clients we have an in-house US Postal Service substation that allows us to get high volume mailings out fast, efficiently and accurately. For short run and small business customers, our facilities are equipped and tuned for targeted mailings to markets as small as a single neighborhood. Serving the Eastern United States and Canada, our facilities are located within a 600 mile radius of more than 40% of the nation's population. This includes the major US markets of Philadelphia, New York City, NJ Coastal Cities, Washington DC, and Boston, as well as the Canadian business centers of Toronto and Montreal. Bayard is, and always will be, committed to growth, innovation, and over the top customer service.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acme-printing-company.jpeg
Acme Printing Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayard-printing-group.jpeg
Bayard Printing Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Acme Printing Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bayard Printing Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acme Printing Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bayard Printing Group in 2025.

Incident History — Acme Printing Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acme Printing Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bayard Printing Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bayard Printing Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acme-printing-company.jpeg
Acme Printing Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayard-printing-group.jpeg
Bayard Printing Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Acme Printing Company company and Bayard Printing Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Bayard Printing Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Acme Printing Company company.

In the current year, Bayard Printing Group company and Acme Printing Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bayard Printing Group company nor Acme Printing Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bayard Printing Group company nor Acme Printing Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bayard Printing Group company nor Acme Printing Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Acme Printing Company company nor Bayard Printing Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Acme Printing Company nor Bayard Printing Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Acme Printing Company company nor Bayard Printing Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bayard Printing Group company employs more people globally than Acme Printing Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Acme Printing Company nor Bayard Printing Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Acme Printing Company nor Bayard Printing Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Acme Printing Company nor Bayard Printing Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Acme Printing Company nor Bayard Printing Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Acme Printing Company nor Bayard Printing Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Acme Printing Company nor Bayard Printing Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N