Comparison Overview

The ACLU of Washington

VS

Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI)

The ACLU of Washington

None, None, Seattle, Washington, US, 98164
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The ACLU is the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. We are the unwavering voice of freedom, fairness and equality for all people in America. We work in the courts, the legislatures, and in our communities to protect and extend basic rights for everyone. The ACLU is fueled by more than a million members and supporters as well as thousands of volunteers. The ACLU takes no government funds - we are people-powered!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI)

undefined, Austin, Texas, 78701, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

The Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator sponsored by the State Bar of Texas is a program for Texas lawyers interested in building sustainable solo law practices serving low- and modest-income clients. Providing both a service to State Bar of Texas Members and the Public, at large, participating lawyers learn how to run a law office with low overhead and a focus on innovation and technology.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aclu-wa.jpeg
The ACLU of Washington
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/txoji.jpeg
Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The ACLU of Washington
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The ACLU of Washington in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) in 2025.

Incident History — The ACLU of Washington (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The ACLU of Washington cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aclu-wa.jpeg
The ACLU of Washington
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/txoji.jpeg
Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The ACLU of Washington company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The ACLU of Washington company.

In the current year, Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company and The ACLU of Washington company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company nor The ACLU of Washington company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company nor The ACLU of Washington company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company nor The ACLU of Washington company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The ACLU of Washington company nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The ACLU of Washington nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The ACLU of Washington company nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The ACLU of Washington company employs more people globally than Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither The ACLU of Washington nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The ACLU of Washington nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The ACLU of Washington nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The ACLU of Washington nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The ACLU of Washington nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The ACLU of Washington nor Texas Opportunity & Justice Incubator (TOJI) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X