Comparison Overview

Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc.

VS

Had Fab Limited

Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc.

21 Rue de Montgolfier, Boucherville, Québec, J4B 8C4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Acier inoxydable Fafard inc est un sous-traitant œuvrant dans la transformation du métal en feuille d’acier inoxydable et nous sommes des experts en tuyauterie et procédé sanitaire. Nous sommes spécialisés dans la conception, la fourniture, la fabrication et l’installation de produits, équipements et assemblages de tous genres. Située à Boucherville depuis 1990, nos opérations sont concentrées dans une usine moderne de 38 000 pi2. Nous y employons des gens qualifiés, disponibles et orientés vers la satisfaction des besoins de notre clientèle diversifiée.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Had Fab Limited

Unit 6-7, Tranent, East Lothian, EH33 1RD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Had-Fab Ltd. are specialists in the design, manufacture and fabrication of steel and aluminium structures. With a firm base in many industrial sectors including, Power Transmission and Distribution, Telecommunications, Rail and General Construction. Had-Fab Ltd. are highly experienced in the fabrication of transmission towers, telecommunication masts and towers, substation support structures, rail overhead line structures and secondary steel structures including stairs, ladders, access gantries and walkways. The broad range of fabrication equipment and design expertise at Had-Fab is transferable across industries and has seen a number of complex, bespoke structures designed and manufactured in house at our site in Macmerry, near Edinburgh, Scotland.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acier-inoxydable-fafard-inc-.jpeg
Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/had-fab-ltd.jpeg
Had Fab Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Had Fab Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Had Fab Limited in 2025.

Incident History — Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Had Fab Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Had Fab Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acier-inoxydable-fafard-inc-.jpeg
Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/had-fab-ltd.jpeg
Had Fab Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company and Had Fab Limited company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Had Fab Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company.

In the current year, Had Fab Limited company and Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Had Fab Limited company nor Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Had Fab Limited company nor Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Had Fab Limited company nor Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company nor Had Fab Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. nor Had Fab Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company nor Had Fab Limited company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Had Fab Limited company employs more people globally than Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. nor Had Fab Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. nor Had Fab Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. nor Had Fab Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. nor Had Fab Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. nor Had Fab Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Acier Inoxydable Fafard Inc. nor Had Fab Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H