Comparison Overview

Ace Agent Financial

VS

Fulcrum Risk Solutions

Ace Agent Financial

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.aceagentfinancial.com

At Ace Agent Financial, we empower individuals and families across the United States to protect what matters most — their future, their finances, and their freedom. We specialize in: Career Opportunities for Agents Life Insurance & Financial Protection Retirement & Wealth Planning Our mission is to help people from all walks of life achieve financial independence and professional success. Whether you're seeking coverage, looking to build a career in financial services, or planning your future — we're here to guide you every step of the way. ✅ Family-Focused Solutions ✅ Career Growth with Mentorship ✅ Proven Business System Join our growing network of agents and clients making smart moves for their future. 📍 Based in the USA | Serving Nationwide

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fulcrum Risk Solutions

132 Westpark Blvd, Columbia, South Carolina, 29210, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fulcrumrisksolutions.com

Fulcrum Risk Solutions is an independent, full-service brokerage firm dedicated to providing holistic risk management and insurance strategies to our clients. We foster organizational stability by implementing tailor-made population health management programs. By focusing on the physical and emotional wellbeing of your employees, we can help improve morale and drive down healthcare costs. Our consultative approach is founded on honest exchanges with our clients, and the relationships we build with them are at the heart of our business. We seek to make the complicated world of risk exposure simple so your organization can focus on doing what it does best.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aceagentfinancial.jpeg
Ace Agent Financial
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fulcrumrisksolutions.jpeg
Fulcrum Risk Solutions
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ace Agent Financial
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fulcrum Risk Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ace Agent Financial in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fulcrum Risk Solutions in 2026.

Incident History — Ace Agent Financial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ace Agent Financial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fulcrum Risk Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fulcrum Risk Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aceagentfinancial.jpeg
Ace Agent Financial
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fulcrumrisksolutions.jpeg
Fulcrum Risk Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ace Agent Financial company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fulcrum Risk Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Fulcrum Risk Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ace Agent Financial company.

In the current year, Fulcrum Risk Solutions company and Ace Agent Financial company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fulcrum Risk Solutions company nor Ace Agent Financial company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fulcrum Risk Solutions company nor Ace Agent Financial company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Fulcrum Risk Solutions company nor Ace Agent Financial company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ace Agent Financial company nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ace Agent Financial nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ace Agent Financial company nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Fulcrum Risk Solutions company employs more people globally than Ace Agent Financial company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.

Neither Ace Agent Financial nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ace Agent Financial nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ace Agent Financial nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ace Agent Financial nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ace Agent Financial nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ace Agent Financial nor Fulcrum Risk Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References