Comparison Overview

Ace Commercial, Inc.

VS

Patterson Graphics Corporation

Ace Commercial, Inc.

10310 Pioneer Blvd., Santa Fe Springs, CA., 90670, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.acecommercial.com

In short, I'm a facilitator of printed products. That would include that project that was due yesterday. My knowledge and experience in the industry allow me the ability to bring solutions to what in our everyday world may seen either unlikely or darn near impossible. I have extensive experience in the following areas of commercial printing. Sheet-fed, heat-set web printing, digital printing, letter press, laser printing, mailing and labeling. Products: Catalogs, brochures, newsletters, postcards, posters, labels, envelopes, signage and packaging items. My clients include local government municipalities and agencies, private industry, to non-profit organizations. To be revised soon.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Patterson Graphics Corporation

903 North Lake Street, Burbank, California, US, 91502
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pattersongraphics.com

Patterson Graphics has been helping businesses look their best since 1976 by combining innovative ideas, leading edge equipment and technology with the ultimate in personal service and value. Although we began our business to serve the needs of the Burbank and Southern California health food label industry, we have since expanded to encompass the entire spectrum of commercial graphics and printing, from simple single color work through stunning full color pieces. We will continue to evolve as a diversely skilled, fast-moving team of professionals ready to learn from each other and meet whatever challenges our clients may face.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ace-commercial-inc..jpeg
Ace Commercial, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Patterson Graphics Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ace Commercial, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Patterson Graphics Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ace Commercial, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patterson Graphics Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Ace Commercial, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ace Commercial, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Patterson Graphics Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patterson Graphics Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ace-commercial-inc..jpeg
Ace Commercial, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Patterson Graphics Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Patterson Graphics Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ace Commercial, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Patterson Graphics Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ace Commercial, Inc. company.

In the current year, Patterson Graphics Corporation company and Ace Commercial, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Patterson Graphics Corporation company nor Ace Commercial, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Patterson Graphics Corporation company nor Ace Commercial, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Patterson Graphics Corporation company nor Ace Commercial, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. company nor Patterson Graphics Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. nor Patterson Graphics Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. company nor Patterson Graphics Corporation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ace Commercial, Inc. company employs more people globally than Patterson Graphics Corporation company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. nor Patterson Graphics Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. nor Patterson Graphics Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. nor Patterson Graphics Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. nor Patterson Graphics Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. nor Patterson Graphics Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ace Commercial, Inc. nor Patterson Graphics Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References