Comparison Overview

AccuLink

VS

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films

AccuLink

Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.acculink.com

Integrated communication solutions to projects involving dye-sublimation, technology, marketing services, print production, distribution/mailing, and fulfillment including web-based order processing. AccuLink also functions as a trade print, bindery, and mailing fulfillment facility to marketing and print resellers nationwide.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films

5 Malcolm Hoyt Drive, Newburyport, Massachusetts, 01915, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.itwshinemark.com

For decades, the world’s leading brands have relied on ITW's metallic, holographic, hot and cold foil products. Similarly, ITW's portfolio of thermal transfer ribbons has long offered capability in a wide array of applications for shipping, date-stamping and traceability. The strength of Illinois Tool Works, the reliability of a globally redundant supply, and a sharpened focus positions ShineMark to lead amidst the growing demands of the packaging, labeling, and coding industries.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acculinkprint.jpeg
AccuLink
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itw-foils.jpeg
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AccuLink
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AccuLink in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films in 2025.

Incident History — AccuLink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AccuLink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acculinkprint.jpeg
AccuLink
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2020
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Server Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itw-foils.jpeg
ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AccuLink company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AccuLink company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has not reported any.

In the current year, ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company and AccuLink company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company nor AccuLink company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company nor AccuLink company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company nor AccuLink company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AccuLink company nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AccuLink nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AccuLink company nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AccuLink company employs more people globally than ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither AccuLink nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AccuLink nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AccuLink nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AccuLink nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AccuLink nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AccuLink nor ITW ShineMark | Foils + Thermal Films holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hitachi Vantara Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Framework prior to versions 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x display the full server stack trace when encountering an error within the GetCdfResource servlet.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Pentaho Data Integration and Analytics Community Dashboard Editor plugin versions before 10.2.0.4, including 9.3.0.x and 8.3.x, deserialize untrusted JSON data without constraining the parser to approved classes and methods.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The impacted element is an unknown function in the library /ctcms/libs/Ct_Config.php of the component Backend System Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument Cj_Add/Cj_Edit results in code injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in CTCMS Content Management System up to 2.1.2. The affected element is the function Save of the file /ctcms/libs/Ct_App.php of the component Backend App Configuration Module. The manipulation of the argument CT_App_Paytype leads to code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. In versions prior to 5.15, it was possible to accept an invitation opened by a different user. Version 5.15. contains a patch. As a workaround, avoid leaving one's Weblate sessions with an invitation opened unattended.

Published
Date
2025-12-15
Updated
Date
2025-12-15
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References