Comparison Overview

Accu-Print

VS

Adcraft Labels

Accu-Print

3503 CrossPoint, San Antonio, 78217, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.accu-print.com

Welcome to Accu-Print. We provide print, marketing, direct mail, variable printing, design and mailing. Let us print and design your annual report, business cards, flyers, brochures, door hangers, postcards, business packages, and more. We offer B2B and B2C websites designed specifically with your company in mind to make ordering, tracking, and fulfilling your orders an easy task. We are also a full service in-house mailing facility for all your mailing requirements - data, inkjetting, inserting, and tabbing.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Adcraft Labels

1230 South Sherman Street , Anaheim, CA, 92805, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.adcraftlabels.com

Building the perfect product requires the right team with the right equipment. Adcraft was founded over 35 years ago. Over that time, we have assembled that perfect team that will take your ideas from concept to finished goods. We utilize the latest technology and operate by ISO9002 standards in our quest to produce the right product at the right price. Adcraft has vast experience in serving the medical, electronic device, nutraceutical, food & beverage, automotive and cosmetic industries. We offer a wide range of products and services like name plates, pressure sensitive labels and flexible packaging. We offer a wide range of manufacturing options; digital printing, color flexo printing, environmentally friendly packaging, specialty printing and doming; including foil stamping, embossing, rotary screen, and doming. Adcraft Label is a division of Adcraft Products

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accu-print.jpeg
Accu-Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adcraft-products.jpeg
Adcraft Labels
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Accu-Print
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Adcraft Labels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accu-Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Adcraft Labels in 2025.

Incident History — Accu-Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accu-Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Adcraft Labels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Adcraft Labels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accu-print.jpeg
Accu-Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/adcraft-products.jpeg
Adcraft Labels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Accu-Print company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Adcraft Labels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Adcraft Labels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Accu-Print company.

In the current year, Adcraft Labels company and Accu-Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Adcraft Labels company nor Accu-Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Adcraft Labels company nor Accu-Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Adcraft Labels company nor Accu-Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Accu-Print company nor Adcraft Labels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Accu-Print nor Adcraft Labels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Accu-Print company nor Adcraft Labels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Adcraft Labels company employs more people globally than Accu-Print company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Accu-Print nor Adcraft Labels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Accu-Print nor Adcraft Labels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Accu-Print nor Adcraft Labels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Accu-Print nor Adcraft Labels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Accu-Print nor Adcraft Labels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Accu-Print nor Adcraft Labels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References