Comparison Overview

Accreditation Canada

VS

The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth

Accreditation Canada

1150 Cyrville Rd, Ottawa, Ontario, CA, K1J 7S9
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Accreditation Canada (AC) empowers and enables organizations to meet national and global standards with innovative programs that are customized to local needs. AC Assessment programs and services support the delivery of safe, high-quality care in health systems, hospitals, laboratories and diagnostic centres, long-term care, rehabilitation centres, primary care, home and community settings. Our specialized accreditation and certification programs support safe, high-quality care for specific populations, health conditions, and health professions. By meeting our assessment program requirements, organizations can earn the trusted designations of Accreditation, Certification or other types of awards that recognize their achievements.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 480
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth

1100 Adams Ave, Floor 1, Audubon, Pennsylvania, US, 19403
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

THE LINCOLN CENTER (TLC) for Family and Youth is a social enterprise company serving areas of Pennsylvania, Ohio, and North Carolina. Founded in 1970 by a behavioral health hospital, TLC is an entrepreneurial nonprofit providing innovative education, coaching, and counseling services to individuals and families, as well as grant writing and management services for school districts and universities. TLC is comprised of five divisions: TLC Leadership Academies, TLC Education Institute, TLC Staffing Solutions, TLC Coaching and Counseling Center, and Heather's Hope: A Center for Victims of Crime. These programs unite under a shared vision “to transform lives and communities - one moment, one choice, one connection at a time."

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 144
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accreditation-canada.jpeg
Accreditation Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tlcfamilyyouth.jpeg
The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Accreditation Canada
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accreditation Canada in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth in 2025.

Incident History — Accreditation Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accreditation Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accreditation-canada.jpeg
Accreditation Canada
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tlcfamilyyouth.jpeg
The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Accreditation Canada company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Accreditation Canada company.

In the current year, The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company and Accreditation Canada company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company nor Accreditation Canada company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company nor Accreditation Canada company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company nor Accreditation Canada company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Accreditation Canada company nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Accreditation Canada nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Accreditation Canada company nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Accreditation Canada company employs more people globally than The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Accreditation Canada nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Accreditation Canada nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Accreditation Canada nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Accreditation Canada nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Accreditation Canada nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Accreditation Canada nor The Lincoln Center for Family and Youth holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H