Comparison Overview

Access Healthcare Services

VS

NHS

Access Healthcare Services

4300 Alpha Rd, Dallas, Texas, 75244, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Access Healthcare provides business process outsourcing, application services, and robotic process automation tools to hospitals, health systems, providers, payers, and related service providers. We operate from 20 delivery centers across nine cities in the US, India, and the Philippines, and our 27,000+ staff is committed to bringing revenue cycle excellence to our customers by leveraging technology, emerging best practices, and global delivery. Based in Dallas, TX, we support over 500,000 healthcare providers through 100+ clients, serving 80+ specialties, process over $70 billion of A/R annually, and ascribe medical codes to over 29 million charts annually. Access Healthcare has developed a proprietary robotic process automation platform that has implemented 3,500+ virtual bots across our service verticals which helps organizations gain greater efficiency. Access Healthcare is HITRUST, PCI DSS, SOC, ISO 27001, and ISO 9001 certified, providing security, availability, and confidentiality of sensitive health information. Our people program, integrated processes, and proven track record with our client base have earned us the “Leader” and “Star Performer” awards by Everest Group’s Healthcare Provider BPO Peak Matrix. To learn how Access Healthcare can help your organization boost its financial performance, visit https://www.accesshealthcare.com

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13,328
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NHS

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The NHS was launched in 1948. It was born out of a long-held ideal that good healthcare should be available to all, regardless of wealth – one of the NHS's core principles. With the exception of some charges, such as prescriptions, optical services and dental services, the NHS in England remains free at the point of use for all UK residents. This currently stands at more than 64.6 million people in the UK and 54.3 million people in England alone. The NHS in England deals with over 1 million patients every 36 hours. It covers everything, including antenatal screening, routine screenings (such as the NHS Health Check), treatments for long-term conditions, transplants, emergency treatment and end-of-life care. Responsibility for healthcare in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales is devolved to the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Scottish Government and the Welsh Assembly Government respectively. The NHS employs more than 1.5 million people, putting it in the top five of the world’s largest workforces, together with the US Department of Defence, McDonalds, Walmart and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army. The NHS in England is the biggest part of the system by far, catering to a population of 54.3 million and employing around 1.2 million people. Of those, the clinically qualified staff include 150,273 doctors, 40,584 general practitioners (GPs), 314,966 nurses and health visitors, 18,862 ambulance staff, and 111,127 hospital and community health service (HCHS) medical and dental staff. The NHS in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland employs 161,415; 84,000 and 66,000 people respectively.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 238,427
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accesshealthcare.jpeg
Access Healthcare Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhs.jpeg
NHS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Access Healthcare Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NHS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Access Healthcare Services in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NHS in 2025.

Incident History — Access Healthcare Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Access Healthcare Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NHS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NHS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accesshealthcare.jpeg
Access Healthcare Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nhs.jpeg
NHS
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Hidden Monitoring Feature
Motivation: Data Collection
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2018
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Software Coding Error
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Access Healthcare Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NHS company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NHS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Access Healthcare Services company has not reported any.

In the current year, NHS company and Access Healthcare Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NHS company nor Access Healthcare Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NHS company nor Access Healthcare Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

NHS company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Access Healthcare Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Access Healthcare Services company nor NHS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Access Healthcare Services nor NHS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Access Healthcare Services company nor NHS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NHS company employs more people globally than Access Healthcare Services company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Access Healthcare Services nor NHS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Access Healthcare Services nor NHS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Access Healthcare Services nor NHS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Access Healthcare Services nor NHS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Access Healthcare Services nor NHS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Access Healthcare Services nor NHS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H