Comparison Overview

Accent Ink

VS

Stellar Print Solutions

Accent Ink

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Accent Ink, Incorporated is a privately owned corporation. In 2006 they purchased the building and other assets of Coast Ink and Coating (formerly Merit Ink Headquarters, established in 1960). The facility was upgraded with new equipment and improvements in manufacturing processes and quality control. Accent Ink manufactures inks and coating for commercial printing companies. It is the only manufacturing facility in the Western United States with the understanding, experience, and equipment capability for manufacturing inks and coatings for the flexographic, gravure, letterpress, lithographic and screen printing processes. While it is a full service ink company, Accent Ink caters mostly to markets requiring specialty inks and coating. A major area of product focus has always been in inks and coatings for the food packaging industry. All products are manufactured in compliance to Federal, State and local standards. We use quality raw materials to enable us to manufacture products which deliver the quality and performance required by our customers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stellar Print Solutions

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

At Stellar Print Solutions, we aim to work with you, not as just another supplier of yours, but as a trusted partner and member of your team. Our mission is to provide communication solutions through outstanding printing services with exceptional value. And we aim to be the best in what we do.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accent-ink.jpeg
Accent Ink
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stellar Print Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Accent Ink
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stellar Print Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Accent Ink in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stellar Print Solutions in 2025.

Incident History — Accent Ink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Accent Ink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stellar Print Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stellar Print Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/accent-ink.jpeg
Accent Ink
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Stellar Print Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Stellar Print Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Accent Ink company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Stellar Print Solutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Accent Ink company.

In the current year, Stellar Print Solutions company and Accent Ink company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stellar Print Solutions company nor Accent Ink company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stellar Print Solutions company nor Accent Ink company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stellar Print Solutions company nor Accent Ink company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Accent Ink company nor Stellar Print Solutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Accent Ink nor Stellar Print Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Accent Ink company nor Stellar Print Solutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Stellar Print Solutions company employs more people globally than Accent Ink company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Accent Ink nor Stellar Print Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Accent Ink nor Stellar Print Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Accent Ink nor Stellar Print Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Accent Ink nor Stellar Print Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Accent Ink nor Stellar Print Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Accent Ink nor Stellar Print Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L