Comparison Overview

Acapo Onsagers

VS

Creighton & Partners

Acapo Onsagers

Munkedamsveien 35., P.O. Box 1813 Vika, OSLO, NO, 0123
Last Update: 2025-11-24

Acapo Onsagers is one of the leading IP Strategy law firms in Norway, serving larger clients both domestic and abroad that seek to gain an IP-strategy that result in a competitive advantage. Acapo Onsagers offers a wide spectrum of services in the areas of patent, trademark and design protection in addition to legal enforcement and strategic use of IP. All patent consultants are qualified European Patent Attorneys and all Attorneys at Law are specialised in IP law. Additionally Onsagers offer a comprehensive competence in business understanding and how to use IP in Business. Onsagers is organized in industry teams, visit our teams today on Onsagers.no ( http://onsagers.no/industries/?lang=en )

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Creighton & Partners

26-28 Bedford Row, London, WC1R 4HE, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Creighton & Partners are a niche family law practice based in Central London in Holborn. We also have an office in Staines, Middlesex. We do both private and publicly funded work. Our Private Family Law department specialises in divorce, financial matters arising from the divorce or the separation of married and un-married couples, children and the breakdown of civil partnerships. We also advise on pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements as well as injunctions where there have been incidents of domestic violence or harassment. Our Public Law Children Department represents local authorities, children and parents in care proceedings. Our private children department advises on residence and contact arrangements, as well as financial arrangements, for children. Many of our solicitors are members of the Law Society’s Children Panel and Resolution Accredited Specialists. We also have a Mental Health Law Department with solicitors who are members of the Law Society’s Mental Health Tribunal Panel.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acapo-onsagers.jpeg
Acapo Onsagers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creighton-and-partners.jpeg
Creighton & Partners
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Acapo Onsagers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Creighton & Partners
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acapo Onsagers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Creighton & Partners in 2025.

Incident History — Acapo Onsagers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acapo Onsagers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Creighton & Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Creighton & Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acapo-onsagers.jpeg
Acapo Onsagers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/creighton-and-partners.jpeg
Creighton & Partners
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Acapo Onsagers company and Creighton & Partners company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Creighton & Partners company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Acapo Onsagers company.

In the current year, Creighton & Partners company and Acapo Onsagers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Creighton & Partners company nor Acapo Onsagers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Creighton & Partners company nor Acapo Onsagers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Creighton & Partners company nor Acapo Onsagers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Acapo Onsagers company nor Creighton & Partners company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Acapo Onsagers nor Creighton & Partners holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Acapo Onsagers company nor Creighton & Partners company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Acapo Onsagers company employs more people globally than Creighton & Partners company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Acapo Onsagers nor Creighton & Partners holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Acapo Onsagers nor Creighton & Partners holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Acapo Onsagers nor Creighton & Partners holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Acapo Onsagers nor Creighton & Partners holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Acapo Onsagers nor Creighton & Partners holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Acapo Onsagers nor Creighton & Partners holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X