Comparison Overview

Acadoodle

VS

Interactive Healthcare Training

Acadoodle

Dublin, Dublin, Dublin, IE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Acadoodle.com is the world's leading medical tutorial website delivering high-quality rich-media tutorials for medical and health-sciences professionals and students. For the best learning experience sign up for a Premium Membership. Acadoodle.com offers courses in a variety of different medical topics. Currently the most visited courses are ECG and ABG. The electrocardiogram is one of the most important diagnostic tools in acute medicine. In this course, we use straightforward language and graphics to explain in simple terms how the normal ECG readout is generated and presented. The arterial blood gas (ABG) is a fundamental test in hospital practice. Abnormalities of arterial pH are seen in many different pathological situations. The ability to interpret pH abnormalities on the ABG can aid in the diagnosis of these conditions. In addition, identification of abnormalities of arterial oxygenation and their correction is a life-saving basic medical intervention.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Interactive Healthcare Training

Staple Gardens, 6 Charlecote Mews , Winchester, Hampshire, GB, SO23 8SR
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Interactive Healthcare Training was formed by Julie Cartwright in 2011, out of a successful career in healthcare recruitment. This gives Interactive Healthcare Training an insight into compliance and recruitment that proves invaluable to our clients. Our goal is to provide our clients with the flexibility needed for modern health and social care training, and the compliance associated with this, at a competitive price. Client and candidate support has always been a priority, as shown by the testimonials listed on our website. We are always ready to help with enquiries, either by telephone or email. We can offer two distinct ways of working: If you are interested in purchasing our training on behalf of your candidates, we can offer a bespoke package of courses selected by you, with a quotation offered per person. If you would like to receive copies of your candidates'​ certificates while they purchase the courses online, we can offer this option too. -Alternatively, if you are an independent user, you can visit our website at www.interactivehealthcaretraining.co.uk and simply click on "Registration"​ to get the process started. We hope you enjoy our training.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acadoodle.jpeg
Acadoodle
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interactive-healthcare-training.jpeg
Interactive Healthcare Training
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Acadoodle
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Interactive Healthcare Training
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acadoodle in 2025.

Incidents vs E-learning Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interactive Healthcare Training in 2025.

Incident History — Acadoodle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acadoodle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Interactive Healthcare Training (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interactive Healthcare Training cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acadoodle.jpeg
Acadoodle
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interactive-healthcare-training.jpeg
Interactive Healthcare Training
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Acadoodle company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Interactive Healthcare Training company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Interactive Healthcare Training company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Acadoodle company.

In the current year, Interactive Healthcare Training company and Acadoodle company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Interactive Healthcare Training company nor Acadoodle company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Interactive Healthcare Training company nor Acadoodle company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Interactive Healthcare Training company nor Acadoodle company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Acadoodle company nor Interactive Healthcare Training company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Acadoodle nor Interactive Healthcare Training holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Acadoodle company nor Interactive Healthcare Training company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Acadoodle company employs more people globally than Interactive Healthcare Training company, reflecting its scale as a E-learning.

Neither Acadoodle nor Interactive Healthcare Training holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Acadoodle nor Interactive Healthcare Training holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Acadoodle nor Interactive Healthcare Training holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Acadoodle nor Interactive Healthcare Training holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Acadoodle nor Interactive Healthcare Training holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Acadoodle nor Interactive Healthcare Training holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

HedgeDoc is an open source, real-time, collaborative, markdown notes application. Prior to 1.10.4, some of HedgeDoc's OAuth2 endpoints for social login providers such as Google, GitHub, GitLab, Facebook or Dropbox lack CSRF protection, since they don't send a state parameter and verify the response using this parameter. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.4.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Langflow versions up to and including 1.6.9 contain a chained vulnerability that enables account takeover and remote code execution. An overly permissive CORS configuration (allow_origins='*' with allow_credentials=True) combined with a refresh token cookie configured as SameSite=None allows a malicious webpage to perform cross-origin requests that include credentials and successfully call the refresh endpoint. An attacker-controlled origin can therefore obtain fresh access_token / refresh_token pairs for a victim session. Obtained tokens permit access to authenticated endpoints — including built-in code-execution functionality — allowing the attacker to execute arbitrary code and achieve full system compromise.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in xerrors Yuxi-Know up to 0.4.0. This vulnerability affects the function OtherEmbedding.aencode of the file /src/models/embed.py. Performing manipulation of the argument health_url results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The patch is named 0ff771dc1933d5a6b78f804115e78a7d8625c3f3. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch. The vendor responded with a vulnerability confirmation and a list of security measures they have established already (e.g. disabled URL parsing, disabled URL upload mode, removed URL-to-markdown conversion).

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Rarlab RAR App up to 7.11 Build 127 on Android. This affects an unknown part of the component com.rarlab.rar. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Attacks of this nature are highly complex. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 7.20 build 128 is able to mitigate this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor responded very professional: "This is the real vulnerability affecting RAR for Android only. WinRAR and Unix RAR versions are not affected. We already fixed it in RAR for Android 7.20 build 128 and we publicly mentioned it in that version changelog. (...) To avoid confusion among users, it would be useful if such disclosure emphasizes that it is RAR for Android only issue and WinRAR isn't affected."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in ZSPACE Q2C NAS up to 1.1.0210050. Affected by this issue is the function zfilev2_api.OpenSafe of the file /v2/file/safe/open of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. This manipulation of the argument safe_dir causes command injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X