Comparison Overview

Acacia Creek Retirement Community

VS

Immanuel Living

Acacia Creek Retirement Community

34400a Mission Blvd, Union City, California, 94587, US
Last Update: 2025-12-24
Between 750 and 799

Acacia Creek is a not-for-profit continuing care retirement community (CCRC), offering several levels of health care and support for vibrant living and successful aging. Our mission is to enrich the independence, well-being, and security of our residents through exceptional services and care based on Masonic values. Acacia Creek reflects and responds to the changing retirements of today’s seniors. We care for the whole person—mind, body, andy spirit—by offering a comprehensive array of recreational programs and supportive health care services. Our value-based pricing preserves the assets of residents and supports the health of our community. We partner with high-quality providers to ensure residents have access to the full range of care they deserve.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Immanuel Living

185 Crestline Ave., Kalispell, Montana, 59901, US
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 750 and 799

As a not-for-profit Life Plan Community, we offer retirement choices that embrace a philosophy of dignified care for the whole person. At Immanuel Living, our residents lead fulfilling and balanced lifestyles by incorporating six dimensions of wellness into every aspect of care we provide: Physical, Emotional, Intellectual, Social, Spiritual, and Occupational. Providing resident-focused care that is professional and compassionate, and that can be obtained all in one location, is important for helping residents to age in place—which is why we’ve expanded to serve a wider variety of needs, over the years. The services in our loving continuum-of-care include: residential living, assisted living, rehabilitation, skilled nursing, and memory care. Even with added services and growth, we’ve remained committed to our residents’ happiness. That’s the history of integrity for which we’re known: People respect us, and we’re determined to never let them down. Locally based and not-for-profit, at Immanuel Living, we serve seniors the way they need to be served: with whatever they need.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 96
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acacia-creek-retirement-community.jpeg
Acacia Creek Retirement Community
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/immanuel-lutheran-communities.jpeg
Immanuel Living
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Acacia Creek Retirement Community
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Immanuel Living
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acacia Creek Retirement Community in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Immanuel Living in 2025.

Incident History — Acacia Creek Retirement Community (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acacia Creek Retirement Community cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Immanuel Living (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Immanuel Living cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/acacia-creek-retirement-community.jpeg
Acacia Creek Retirement Community
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/immanuel-lutheran-communities.jpeg
Immanuel Living
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Immanuel Living company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Acacia Creek Retirement Community company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Immanuel Living company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Acacia Creek Retirement Community company.

In the current year, Immanuel Living company and Acacia Creek Retirement Community company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Immanuel Living company nor Acacia Creek Retirement Community company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Immanuel Living company nor Acacia Creek Retirement Community company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Immanuel Living company nor Acacia Creek Retirement Community company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community company nor Immanuel Living company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community nor Immanuel Living holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community company nor Immanuel Living company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Immanuel Living company employs more people globally than Acacia Creek Retirement Community company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community nor Immanuel Living holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community nor Immanuel Living holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community nor Immanuel Living holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community nor Immanuel Living holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community nor Immanuel Living holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Acacia Creek Retirement Community nor Immanuel Living holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N