Comparison Overview

Abu Dhabi Ports

VS

Sandd

Abu Dhabi Ports

undefined, Abu Dhabi, undefined, undefined, ae
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Our 10 ports offer a wide range of commercial and leisure services. We have integrated several innovative and efficient technologies into our port operations, thus making them some of the region’s most sustainable and technologically advanced ports.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 263
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sandd

IJsseldijk 2 Apeldoorn, 7325 WZ, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Sandd is a Dutch postal company that focuses on the delivery of addressed bulk mail, such as direct mail and subscription magazines. Since the liberalization of the Dutch postal market in 2009 Sandd also focuses on transaction mail such as invoices and policies. Sandd wants her clients connect with their audiences through products and transmit information, provide and improve with the goal of any accurate, timely and reliable information, motivation and activation. Sandd distributes fixed delivery days via a self-built nationwide network. We are an innovative organization that responds to new developments in the postal market. This translates into a high level of service and attractive pricing. You can reach us by phone at 055-368 25 25 or email at [email protected]. Visit us also look at www.sandd.nl.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abu-dhabi-ports.jpeg
Abu Dhabi Ports
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandd.jpeg
Sandd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Abu Dhabi Ports
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sandd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abu Dhabi Ports in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandd in 2025.

Incident History — Abu Dhabi Ports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abu Dhabi Ports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sandd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abu-dhabi-ports.jpeg
Abu Dhabi Ports
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandd.jpeg
Sandd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Abu Dhabi Ports company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sandd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sandd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Abu Dhabi Ports company.

In the current year, Sandd company and Abu Dhabi Ports company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sandd company nor Abu Dhabi Ports company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sandd company nor Abu Dhabi Ports company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sandd company nor Abu Dhabi Ports company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Abu Dhabi Ports company nor Sandd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Abu Dhabi Ports nor Sandd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Abu Dhabi Ports company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sandd company.

Sandd company employs more people globally than Abu Dhabi Ports company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither Abu Dhabi Ports nor Sandd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Abu Dhabi Ports nor Sandd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Abu Dhabi Ports nor Sandd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Abu Dhabi Ports nor Sandd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Abu Dhabi Ports nor Sandd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Abu Dhabi Ports nor Sandd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H