Comparison Overview

Abri Group

VS

UNICEF

Abri Group

Collins House, Eastleigh, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-03
Between 700 and 749

We’re Abri, a housing association based in the south of England. One of the largest in fact. We own own and manage more than 58,000 homes and various community assets, serving around 113,000 customers across the South of England. There aren’t enough homes for everyone who needs one. And we don’t think that’s right. So we build, own, look after and sell homes that people can afford. Including homes for affordable and social rent. And homes to buy through things like Shared Ownership and Help to Buy. We also have houses for market rent and sale too. And that’s not the half of it… Find out more about what we do on our website!

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 902
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

UNICEF

3 United Nations Plaza, New York, New York, US, 10017
Last Update: 2026-01-02
Between 800 and 849

UNICEF works in some of the world’s toughest places, to reach the world’s most disadvantaged children. To save their lives. To defend their rights. To help them fulfill their potential. Across 190 countries and territories, we work for every child, everywhere, every day, to build a better world for everyone. And we never give up.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 44,786
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abri-group.jpeg
Abri Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicef.jpeg
UNICEF
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Abri Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
UNICEF
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

Abri Group has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UNICEF in 2026.

Incident History — Abri Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abri Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — UNICEF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UNICEF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abri-group.jpeg
Abri Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/unicef.jpeg
UNICEF
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Email
Blog: Blog

FAQ

UNICEF company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Abri Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Abri Group and UNICEF have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Abri Group company has reported more cyber incidents than UNICEF company.

Neither UNICEF company nor Abri Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Abri Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other UNICEF company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither UNICEF company nor Abri Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Abri Group company nor UNICEF company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Abri Group nor UNICEF holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

UNICEF company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Abri Group company.

UNICEF company employs more people globally than Abri Group company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither Abri Group nor UNICEF holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Abri Group nor UNICEF holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Abri Group nor UNICEF holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Abri Group nor UNICEF holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Abri Group nor UNICEF holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Abri Group nor UNICEF holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

REDAXO is a PHP-based content management system. Prior to version 5.20.2, authenticated users with backup permissions can read arbitrary files within the webroot via path traversal in the Backup addon's file export functionality. The Backup addon does not validate the `EXPDIR` POST parameter against the UI-generated allowlist of permitted directories. An attacker can supply relative paths containing `../` sequences (or even absolute paths inside the document root) to include any readable file in the generated `.tar.gz` archive. Version 5.20.2 fixes this issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MONAI (Medical Open Network for AI) is an AI toolkit for health care imaging. In versions up to and including 1.5.1, a Path Traversal (Zip Slip) vulnerability exists in MONAI's `_download_from_ngc_private()` function. The function uses `zipfile.ZipFile.extractall()` without path validation, while other similar download functions in the same codebase properly use the existing `safe_extract_member()` function. Commit 4014c8475626f20f158921ae0cf98ed259ae4d59 fixes this issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Description

axios4go is a Go HTTP client library. Prior to version 0.6.4, a race condition vulnerability exists in the shared HTTP client configuration. The global `defaultClient` is mutated during request execution without synchronization, directly modifying the shared `http.Client`'s `Transport`, `Timeout`, and `CheckRedirect` properties. Impacted applications include that that use axios4go with concurrent requests (multiple goroutines, `GetAsync`, `PostAsync`, etc.), those where different requests use different proxy configurations, and those that handle sensitive data (authentication credentials, tokens, API keys). Version 0.6.4 fixes this issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

pnpm is a package manager. Versions 6.25.0 through 10.26.2 have a Command Injection vulnerability when using environment variable substitution in .npmrc configuration files with tokenHelper settings. An attacker who can control environment variables during pnpm operations could achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) in build environments. This issue is fixed in version 10.27.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

User interface (ui) misrepresentation of critical information in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L