Comparison Overview

Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense

VS

BES Enterprises, LLC

Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense

205 Van Buren St, Herndon, VA, 20170, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abraxascorp.com/

Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense, a member of the Cubic Corporation family, is a trusted partner to the U.S. National Security community, supporting its worldwide mission with both service and technical related programs across a vast array of Intelligence Community (IC) organizations. Our staff brings fresh perspectives from engineering, academia, national security, and defense to collaborate on multifaceted problems. We transform commercial and intelligence challenges into operational success. Abraxas’ capabilities cover three core business areas: Mission Support Services, Systems and Technology Solutions, and Training. MISSION SUPPORT SERVICES including - Analysis/Operational support - Counterintelligence - Technical Support SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS including - Software Engineering & Systems Integration - Systems Engineering & Architecture - Data Management, Analysis, ETL & Data Warehousing - Natural Language Processing - Cybersecurity - System and Network Sustainment & Operations - Program Management TRAINING including - Intelligence Analysis - Technical & Operational

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

BES Enterprises, LLC

None
Last Update: 2025-12-16
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bestechtn.com

BES Technologies, LLC is a Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB). BEST specializes in washing, cleaning, repairing, seal testing, and packaging respirators for the Department of Energy and Prime Contractors. BEST currently has contracts with Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Wachenhut Services, and Safety and Ecology Corporation. BEST is always open to expanding existing services and contracts through teaming agreements and subcontracting opportunities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abraxas-corporation.jpeg
Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
BES Enterprises, LLC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BES Enterprises, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BES Enterprises, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BES Enterprises, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BES Enterprises, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abraxas-corporation.jpeg
Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
BES Enterprises, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BES Enterprises, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, BES Enterprises, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company.

In the current year, BES Enterprises, LLC company and Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BES Enterprises, LLC company nor Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither BES Enterprises, LLC company nor Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither BES Enterprises, LLC company nor Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company nor BES Enterprises, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense nor BES Enterprises, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company nor BES Enterprises, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense company employs more people globally than BES Enterprises, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense nor BES Enterprises, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense nor BES Enterprises, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense nor BES Enterprises, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense nor BES Enterprises, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense nor BES Enterprises, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Abraxas-Cubic Global Defense nor BES Enterprises, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References