Comparison Overview

Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A.

VS

Morgan Sports Law

Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A.

7800 W. Oakland Park Boulevard, Sunrise, Florida, 33351, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are Florida injury lawyers who specialize in cases dealing with wrongful death, product liability, premises liability, auto accidents, medical malpractice, and any other case where wrongful personal injury was involved. Your Fort Lauderdale injury lawyers are here for you during this stressful and uncertain time. They will act as your advocate and be the experienced and knowledgeable Florida personal injury attorney you can turn to for help in your time of need.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Morgan Sports Law

3 More London Place, London, England, SE1 2, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Morgan Sports Law is a boutique law firm devoted to sports arbitration and litigation. Our lawyers are known in particular for their expertise in cases involving doping, corruption and eligibility disputes. The firm represents sportspeople before both domestic and international courts, such as the Court of Arbitration for Sport, the American Arbitration Association, the High Court, the National Anti-Doping Panel (UK) and the FIFA Dispute Resolution Chamber. www.morgansl.com

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abramowitz-&-pomerantz-p-a-.jpeg
Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-sports-law.jpeg
Morgan Sports Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Morgan Sports Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morgan Sports Law in 2025.

Incident History — Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Morgan Sports Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morgan Sports Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abramowitz-&-pomerantz-p-a-.jpeg
Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-sports-law.jpeg
Morgan Sports Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Morgan Sports Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Morgan Sports Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company.

In the current year, Morgan Sports Law company and Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Morgan Sports Law company nor Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Morgan Sports Law company nor Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Morgan Sports Law company nor Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company nor Morgan Sports Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. nor Morgan Sports Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company nor Morgan Sports Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Morgan Sports Law company employs more people globally than Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. nor Morgan Sports Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. nor Morgan Sports Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. nor Morgan Sports Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. nor Morgan Sports Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. nor Morgan Sports Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Abramowitz, Pomerantz and Morehead, P.A. nor Morgan Sports Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X