Comparison Overview

Aboitiz Group

VS

Marsh McLennan

Aboitiz Group

NAC Tower, 32nd Street,, Bonifacio Global City, Taguig City, PH
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aboitiz.com

Here at Aboitiz, we aim to change today to shape the future. With five generations of success behind us, the Aboitiz Group is currently transforming into the Philippines’ first techglomerate. Amidst this evolution, we remain committed to our core mission of driving change for a better world by advancing businesses and communities.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11,396
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Marsh McLennan

1166 Avenue of the Americas, None, New York, NY, US, 10036
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849
https://www.marshmclennan.com/

Marsh McLennan (NYSE: MMC) is a global leader in risk, strategy and people, advising clients in 130 countries across four businesses: Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer and Oliver Wyman. With annual revenue of $23 billion and more than 85,000 colleagues, Marsh McLennan helps build the confidence to thrive through the power of perspective. Follow us on X at @MarshMcLennan.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 67,727
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aboitiz.jpeg
Aboitiz Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marshmclennan.jpeg
Marsh McLennan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aboitiz Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Marsh McLennan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aboitiz Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marsh McLennan in 2025.

Incident History — Aboitiz Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aboitiz Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Marsh McLennan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marsh McLennan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aboitiz.jpeg
Aboitiz Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/marshmclennan.jpeg
Marsh McLennan
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2021
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Marsh McLennan company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aboitiz Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Marsh McLennan company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Aboitiz Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Marsh McLennan company and Aboitiz Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Marsh McLennan company nor Aboitiz Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Marsh McLennan company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Aboitiz Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Marsh McLennan company nor Aboitiz Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aboitiz Group company nor Marsh McLennan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aboitiz Group nor Marsh McLennan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aboitiz Group company nor Marsh McLennan company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Marsh McLennan company employs more people globally than Aboitiz Group company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Aboitiz Group nor Marsh McLennan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aboitiz Group nor Marsh McLennan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aboitiz Group nor Marsh McLennan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aboitiz Group nor Marsh McLennan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aboitiz Group nor Marsh McLennan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aboitiz Group nor Marsh McLennan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References