Comparison Overview

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

VS

Maybank

ABN AMRO Bank N.V.

Gustav Mahlerlaan 10, Amsterdam, NL, 1082PP
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 800 and 849

Welkom op het LinkedIn-account van ABN AMRO. We staan 24/7 klaar om jouw vragen te beantwoorden. Onze taak is altijd om de klant te ondersteunen op het moment dat het er echt op aankomt. Dat is onze verantwoordelijkheid. Dat maakt ons relevant. En wat er vandaag de dag toe doet voor de klant is de transitie naar een duurzaam tijdperk. Klanten willen een positieve invloed uitoefenen en als bank willen we ze daarbij helpen. Die overgang naar duurzame manieren van wonen en werken ondersteunen we met een naadloze (financiële) ervaring. Mogelijk gemaakt door zeer betrokken, vaardige en productieve mensen. En natuurlijk geven we daarin zelf het goede voorbeeld. Bij onze bank zijn ongeveer 22.500 mensen werkzaam, waarvan meer dan 5.000 buiten Nederland. Met al deze collega's bieden wij je hier onze kennis en deskundigheid over de financiële markt, informatie over verschillende sectoren, nieuws over onze duurzame strategie en onze organisatiecultuur. Wil je hier meer over weten? Volg ons op LinkedIn of bezoek onze website.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 25,645
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Maybank

100 Jalan Tun Perak, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, MY, 50050
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 800 and 849

Maybank Group is the leading financial services provider in Malaysia catering to the needs of consumers, investors, entrepreneurs, non-profit organisations and corporations. The Group, which has expanded internationally, has the largest network among Malaysian banks of over 2,400 branches and offices in 20 countries, employing over 44,000 Maybankers and serving over 22 million customers. It is the only regional bank with a presence in all 10 ASEAN countries (as of November 2016). By strengthening our core business and franchise, we gain competitive advantage by achieving synergies across our diverse group. Domestically we aim to achieve leadership across key and profitable segments. Internationally we capture value from new investments and continue to pursue organic expansion by delivering innovation and superior customer value. We are a top recruiter of talent and view our leadership pool and talent pipeline as key to realising our aspirations. We constantly seek to enhance performance management and achieve cost optimisation by focusing on effective IT operations and enhancing employee productivity. Maybank & Maybank Islamic are members of PIDM in Malaysia.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 26,305
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abn-amro.jpeg
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maybank.jpeg
Maybank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Maybank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABN AMRO Bank N.V. in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Maybank in 2026.

Incident History — ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Maybank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Maybank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abn-amro.jpeg
ABN AMRO Bank N.V.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/maybank.jpeg
Maybank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Maybank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Maybank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company.

In the current year, Maybank company and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Maybank company nor ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Maybank company nor ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Maybank company nor ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company nor Maybank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ABN AMRO Bank N.V. nor Maybank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Maybank company.

Maybank company employs more people globally than ABN AMRO Bank N.V. company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither ABN AMRO Bank N.V. nor Maybank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ABN AMRO Bank N.V. nor Maybank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ABN AMRO Bank N.V. nor Maybank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ABN AMRO Bank N.V. nor Maybank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ABN AMRO Bank N.V. nor Maybank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ABN AMRO Bank N.V. nor Maybank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N