Comparison Overview

Abingdon Foundation

VS

Lung Cancer Research Foundation

Abingdon Foundation

4224 W Charleston Blvd, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102, US
Last Update: 2026-02-19
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://abingdonfoundation.org

The time is right for women everywhere to evolve their passions into their own unique expressions of careers and lifestyles unrestricted by traditions, glass ceilings or any other limitations. Abingdon Foundation strives to influence, encourage and embolden women in their pursuits of extraordinary lives through sponsorships, community outreach & networking opportunities. *SPONSORSHIP Ensuring that young women have the tools and connections they need to succeed. *COMMUNITY OUTREACH Women inspiring women to do more and be more… in your hometown! *NETWORKING OPPORTUNITIES It’s not about what you know, it’s about who you know.

NAICS: 813
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Lung Cancer Research Foundation

501 7th Avenue, Suite 230, New York, NY, 10018, US
Last Update: 2026-02-18
Between 750 and 799
https://www.LCRF.org

The Lung Cancer Research Foundation (LCRF) is the leading nonprofit organization focused on funding innovative, high-reward research with the potential to extend survival and improve quality of life for people with lung cancer. LCRF’s mission is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer. To date, LCRF has awarded 394 research grants, totaling $39 million to investigators around the world. In addition to funding lung cancer research, the organization focuses on lung cancer awareness and educational programs, like its monthly #TogetherSeparately webinar series. Its Free to Breathe fundraising events bring the lung cancer community together in support of lung cancer research.

NAICS: 8132
NAICS Definition: Grantmaking and Giving Services
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abingdon-foundation.jpeg
Abingdon Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lung-cancer-research-foundation.jpeg
Lung Cancer Research Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Abingdon Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lung Cancer Research Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abingdon Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Philanthropic Fundraising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lung Cancer Research Foundation in 2026.

Incident History — Abingdon Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abingdon Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lung Cancer Research Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lung Cancer Research Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abingdon-foundation.jpeg
Abingdon Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lung-cancer-research-foundation.jpeg
Lung Cancer Research Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Abingdon Foundation company and Lung Cancer Research Foundation company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Lung Cancer Research Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Abingdon Foundation company.

In the current year, Lung Cancer Research Foundation company and Abingdon Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lung Cancer Research Foundation company nor Abingdon Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lung Cancer Research Foundation company nor Abingdon Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lung Cancer Research Foundation company nor Abingdon Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Abingdon Foundation company nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Abingdon Foundation nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Abingdon Foundation company nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lung Cancer Research Foundation company employs more people globally than Abingdon Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Philanthropic Fundraising Services.

Neither Abingdon Foundation nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Abingdon Foundation nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Abingdon Foundation nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Abingdon Foundation nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Abingdon Foundation nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Abingdon Foundation nor Lung Cancer Research Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References