Comparison Overview

Aberdeen Science Centre

VS

The Dayton Art Institute

Aberdeen Science Centre

179 Constitution Street, Aberdeen, AB24 5TU, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Making Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) fun, exciting, engaging and inspiring for families, schools and communities is our core mission. Established in 1989, Aberdeen Science Centre is a recognised charity that aims to serve as a STEM Hub to connect and engage members of the public, industry, academia and government. As a landmark visitor attraction, we encourage active involvement in learning with hands-on exhibits, investigative workshops and exciting shows and demonstrations. We promote an environment of curiosity and life-long learning. As a STEM partner, we work with local organisations to help them showcase their innovation and fulfill their Corporate Social Responsibility objectives. We also provide original meeting facilities - ranging from meeting rooms to show theaters - along with tailor-made services (catering, visits, workshops, etc.). Work with us and enrich your organisation. Contact us on 01224 640340 or [email protected]

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Dayton Art Institute

456 Belmonte Park North, Dayton, Ohio 45405, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Dayton Art Institute is committed to enriching the community by creating meaningful experiences with art that are available to all. Founded in 1919, The Dayton Art Institute is one of the region’s premier fine arts museums. In addition to exhibiting outstanding special exhibitions and impressive collections of art from throughout the world, the museum is renowned for education programming that includes an array of offerings for diverse audiences.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 73
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aberdeen-science-centre.jpeg
Aberdeen Science Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dayton-art-institute.jpeg
The Dayton Art Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aberdeen Science Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Dayton Art Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aberdeen Science Centre in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Dayton Art Institute in 2026.

Incident History — Aberdeen Science Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aberdeen Science Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Dayton Art Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Dayton Art Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aberdeen-science-centre.jpeg
Aberdeen Science Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dayton-art-institute.jpeg
The Dayton Art Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Dayton Art Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aberdeen Science Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Dayton Art Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aberdeen Science Centre company.

In the current year, The Dayton Art Institute company and Aberdeen Science Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute company nor Aberdeen Science Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute company nor Aberdeen Science Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Dayton Art Institute company nor Aberdeen Science Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre company nor The Dayton Art Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor The Dayton Art Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre company nor The Dayton Art Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Dayton Art Institute company employs more people globally than Aberdeen Science Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor The Dayton Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor The Dayton Art Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor The Dayton Art Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor The Dayton Art Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor The Dayton Art Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor The Dayton Art Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H