Comparison Overview

Aberdeen Science Centre

VS

Centre national de l'audiovisuel

Aberdeen Science Centre

179 Constitution Street, Aberdeen, undefined, AB24 5TU, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Making Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) fun, exciting, engaging and inspiring for families, schools and communities is our core mission. Established in 1989, Aberdeen Science Centre is a recognised charity that aims to serve as a STEM Hub to connect and engage members of the public, industry, academia and government. As a landmark visitor attraction, we encourage active involvement in learning with hands-on exhibits, investigative workshops and exciting shows and demonstrations. We promote an environment of curiosity and life-long learning. As a STEM partner, we work with local organisations to help them showcase their innovation and fulfill their Corporate Social Responsibility objectives. We also provide original meeting facilities - ranging from meeting rooms to show theaters - along with tailor-made services (catering, visits, workshops, etc.). Work with us and enrich your organisation. Contact us on 01224 640340 or [email protected]

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Centre national de l'audiovisuel

Rue du Centenaire, Dudelange, 3475, LU
Last Update: 2026-01-23

CENTRE NATIONAL DE L'AUDIOVISUEL (CNA) Unique cultural diversity in the world of sound and images The Centre national de l’audiovisuel (CNA) is a cultural institute created in 1989 and placed under the authority of the Ministry of Culture. Its missions are the safeguarding, development and promotion of Luxembourg's audiovisual and photographic heritage. Since 2007, the CNA has opened two exhibition spaces, a cinema (CinéStarlight), a media library where you can consult and borrow various documents (Médiathèque), and has developed various workshops for every age related to photography, sound and moving images. Conservation, restoration, production, distribution, supports for creation or education, CNA has a wide range of tasks, which involve numerous national and international specialists and creators. www.cna.lu www.steichencollections-cna.lu

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aberdeen-science-centre.jpeg
Aberdeen Science Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnalux.jpeg
Centre national de l'audiovisuel
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aberdeen Science Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Centre national de l'audiovisuel
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aberdeen Science Centre in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre national de l'audiovisuel in 2026.

Incident History — Aberdeen Science Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aberdeen Science Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Centre national de l'audiovisuel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre national de l'audiovisuel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aberdeen-science-centre.jpeg
Aberdeen Science Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnalux.jpeg
Centre national de l'audiovisuel
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Centre national de l'audiovisuel company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aberdeen Science Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Centre national de l'audiovisuel company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aberdeen Science Centre company.

In the current year, Centre national de l'audiovisuel company and Aberdeen Science Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Centre national de l'audiovisuel company nor Aberdeen Science Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Centre national de l'audiovisuel company nor Aberdeen Science Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Centre national de l'audiovisuel company nor Aberdeen Science Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre company nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre company nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Centre national de l'audiovisuel company employs more people globally than Aberdeen Science Centre company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aberdeen Science Centre nor Centre national de l'audiovisuel holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N