Comparison Overview

ABD Signs & Printing

VS

Cox Printers

ABD Signs & Printing

8945 W Larkspur Dr, Peoria, Arizona, 85381, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abdsignsandprinting.com

ABD Signs & Printing is a family-owned & operated business that has been delivering great products, great service and competitive pricing, since 2005. ABD Signs & Printing is also proud to be the West Valley's largest sign & printing company servicing Surprise, Peoria, Glendale, Phoenix and beyond. We produce a wide variety of signs and banners including: Vehicle Wraps, Menu Boards, Yard Signs, Vinyl Banners, Car Magnets, Realtor Signs, Window & Vehicle Graphics, Job Site Signs, Monument Signs, Window Clings & More. With our fast production time, we can have your banner completed within 24 hours and same-day service is also offered upon request. Our printing capabilities are not just limited to banners and signs but, we also offer full service offset & digital printing for all of your marketing collateral such as Business Cards, Flyers, Brochures, Menus, Postcards, Presentation Folders, Table Tents, Letterhead, Envelopes & More! Also, we can handle any Direct Mail & EDDM Campaign you have coming up. ABD Signs & Printing would be proud to be your preferred printing provider. We look forward to working with you.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cox Printers

11 McKinley St, Linden, New Jersey, 07036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.coxprinters.com/

Cox Printers offers a wide range of services to its customers, all delivered with the same high quality and responsiveness it has provided for more than 90 years. The company provides a truly unique mixture of commercial products and services that enable the customer to save time and money and to avoid the aggravation of dealing with many different vendors. * Graphic design and production * Electronic pre-press * One to six-color printing * Complete bindery services * Office supplies and furniture * Warehousing * Pick-n-pack distribution nationwide * Computerized tracking and ordering * Office Supplies * Furniture * Big Color- complete digital output 60"​ x ∞ * High Speed Copying-

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abd-signs-&-printing.jpeg
ABD Signs & Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cox-printers.jpeg
Cox Printers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ABD Signs & Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cox Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABD Signs & Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cox Printers in 2025.

Incident History — ABD Signs & Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABD Signs & Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cox Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cox Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abd-signs-&-printing.jpeg
ABD Signs & Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cox-printers.jpeg
Cox Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ABD Signs & Printing company and Cox Printers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cox Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ABD Signs & Printing company.

In the current year, Cox Printers company and ABD Signs & Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cox Printers company nor ABD Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cox Printers company nor ABD Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cox Printers company nor ABD Signs & Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ABD Signs & Printing company nor Cox Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ABD Signs & Printing nor Cox Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cox Printers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ABD Signs & Printing company.

Cox Printers company employs more people globally than ABD Signs & Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither ABD Signs & Printing nor Cox Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ABD Signs & Printing nor Cox Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ABD Signs & Printing nor Cox Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ABD Signs & Printing nor Cox Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ABD Signs & Printing nor Cox Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ABD Signs & Printing nor Cox Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References