Comparison Overview

ABC Consultants

VS

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

ABC Consultants

1st Floor Eros Corporate Tower, New Delhi, Delhi, 110019, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abcconsultants.in

ABC Consultants is India's leading executive search and talent advisory firm, proudly shaping the future of multinationals and Indian businesses for over 50 years. Our team of 150 consultants spans 21 industry verticals and brings an agile mind-set, an empathetic perspective and an entrepreneurial spirit to every client engagement. We have helped our clients hire top-tier leadership talent, driving success stories across diverse industries.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12,674
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Boston Consulting Group (BCG)

200 Pier 4 Blvd, Boston, Massachusetts, 02210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bcg.com

Boston Consulting Group partners with leaders in business and society to tackle their most important challenges and capture their greatest opportunities. BCG was the pioneer in business strategy when it was founded in 1963. Today, we work closely with clients to embrace a transformational approach aimed at benefiting all stakeholders—empowering organizations to grow, build sustainable competitive advantage, and drive positive societal impact. Our diverse, global teams bring deep industry and functional expertise and a range of perspectives that question the status quo and spark change. BCG delivers solutions through leading-edge management consulting, technology and design, and corporate and digital ventures. We work in a uniquely collaborative model across the firm and throughout all levels of the client organization, fueled by the goal of helping our clients thrive and enabling them to make the world a better place. BCG Privacy Policy: https://www.bcg.com/about/privacy-policy.aspx

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 37,117
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abc-consultants.jpeg
ABC Consultants
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-consulting-group.jpeg
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ABC Consultants
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABC Consultants in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Boston Consulting Group (BCG) in 2025.

Incident History — ABC Consultants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABC Consultants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abc-consultants.jpeg
ABC Consultants
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/boston-consulting-group.jpeg
Boston Consulting Group (BCG)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ABC Consultants company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ABC Consultants company.

In the current year, Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company and ABC Consultants company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company nor ABC Consultants company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company nor ABC Consultants company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company nor ABC Consultants company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ABC Consultants company nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ABC Consultants nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ABC Consultants company.

Boston Consulting Group (BCG) company employs more people globally than ABC Consultants company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither ABC Consultants nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ABC Consultants nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ABC Consultants nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ABC Consultants nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ABC Consultants nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ABC Consultants nor Boston Consulting Group (BCG) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References