Comparison Overview

Abbey

VS

Intesa Sanpaolo

Abbey

Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abbey.com

Abbey National plc is the 6th biggest UK bank with 705 branches under the Abbey brand. It also uses the Cahoot and since September 2008, the Bradford and Bingley savings brands. Subsidiary banks include Cater Allen Limited. Since 2004 Abbey has been part of the Santander group. Santander is the largest Eurozone Financial Services company. Recent Santander acquisitions include UK Bank Alliance and Leicester.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Intesa Sanpaolo

Piazza San Carlo 156, Turin, TO, IT, 10121
Last Update: 2025-12-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.group.intesasanpaolo.com

Intesa Sanpaolo è il maggior gruppo bancario in Italia con una significativa presenza internazionale. Il suo business model distintivo la rende leader a livello europeo nel Wealth Management, Protection & Advisory e ne caratterizza l’orientamento al digitale. I’impegno in ambito ESG prevede, entro il 2025, €115 miliardi di finanziamenti impact e contributi per 500 milioni a supporto delle persone in difficoltà. Gallerie d’Italia, è la sede espositiva del patrimonio artistico della banca e di progetti artistici di riconosciuto valore. https://group.intesasanpaolo.com/it/ _______________ Intesa Sanpaolo is the largest banking group in Italy with a significant international presence. Its distinctive business model makes it a European leader in wealth management, protection and advisory and ensures its strong focus on digital. Its commitment to ESG foresees, by 2025, €115 billion of impact financing and contributions of €500 million to support people in need. Gallerie d'Italia, is the exhibition venue for the bank's artistic heritage and artistic projects of recognised value. https://group.intesasanpaolo.com/en/ _________________ Sede Legale: Piazza San Carlo 156, 10121 Torino – Sede Secondaria: Via Monte di Pietà 8, 20121 Milano Tel. 011 555.1 – mail: [email protected] pec: [email protected] Registro delle Imprese di Torino e Codice Fiscale 00799960158 – Partita Iva 10810700152 N. Iscr. Albo Banche 5361 N. Iscr. Registro degli Intermediari Assicurativi e Riassicurativi - Sez. D. 000027210, data di iscrizione 01.02.2007 - Intermediario soggetto alla vigilanza dell'IVASS: https://servizi.ivass.it/RuirPubblica Per la presentazione dei reclami e eventuali sistemi di risoluzione delle controversie https://www.intesasanpaolo.com/it/persone-e-famiglie/reclami.html. Per assistenza: https://www.intesasanpaolo.com/it/common/parla-con-noi.html. Netiquette: https://www.intesasanpaolo.com/it/common/landing/anti-phishing/netiquette.html

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 54,128
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abbey.jpeg
Abbey
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intesa-sanpaolo.jpeg
Intesa Sanpaolo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Abbey
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Intesa Sanpaolo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abbey in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

Intesa Sanpaolo has 4.17% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Abbey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abbey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Intesa Sanpaolo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intesa Sanpaolo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abbey.jpeg
Abbey
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intesa-sanpaolo.jpeg
Intesa Sanpaolo
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Legitimate Use of Cookies and Tracking Technologies
Motivation: Analytics, Personalized Advertising, Content Measurement, Audience Research
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Intesa Sanpaolo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Abbey company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Intesa Sanpaolo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Abbey company has not reported any.

In the current year, Intesa Sanpaolo company has reported more cyber incidents than Abbey company.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo company nor Abbey company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Intesa Sanpaolo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Abbey company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo company nor Abbey company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Abbey company nor Intesa Sanpaolo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Abbey nor Intesa Sanpaolo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intesa Sanpaolo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Abbey company.

Intesa Sanpaolo company employs more people globally than Abbey company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Abbey nor Intesa Sanpaolo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Abbey nor Intesa Sanpaolo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Abbey nor Intesa Sanpaolo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Abbey nor Intesa Sanpaolo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Abbey nor Intesa Sanpaolo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Abbey nor Intesa Sanpaolo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References