Comparison Overview

Abbey

VS

Bank of India

Abbey

Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abbey.com

Abbey National plc is the 6th biggest UK bank with 705 branches under the Abbey brand. It also uses the Cahoot and since September 2008, the Bradford and Bingley savings brands. Subsidiary banks include Cater Allen Limited. Since 2004 Abbey has been part of the Santander group. Santander is the largest Eurozone Financial Services company. Recent Santander acquisitions include UK Bank Alliance and Leicester.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Bank of India

C-5, G Block BKC, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, C-5, G Block BKC, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra East, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400051, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bankofindia.co.in

Welcome to Bank of India's official LinkedIn page! Join us & stay tuned to learn about our products, exciting offers & latest happenings. Bank of India was founded on 7th September, 1906 by a group of eminent business professionals from Mumbai. The Bank was under private ownership and control till July 1969 when it was nationalized along with 13 other banks. Beginning with one office in Mumbai, with a paid-up capital of Rs.50 lakh and 50 employees, the Bank has made a rapid growth over the years and blossomed into a mighty institution with a strong national presence and sizable international operations. In business volume, the Bank occupies a premier position among the nationalized banks. The Bank has over 5100 branches in India spread over all states/ union territories including specialized branches. These branches are controlled through 68 Zonal Offices and 12 NBG Offices. There are 23 foreign branches, 4 foreign subsidiaries, 1 representative office and 1 joint venture abroad.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abbey.jpeg
Abbey
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bankofindiaofficial.jpeg
Bank of India
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Abbey
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bank of India
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Abbey in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of India in 2025.

Incident History — Abbey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Abbey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bank of India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bank of India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abbey.jpeg
Abbey
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bankofindiaofficial.jpeg
Bank of India
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bank of India company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Abbey company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bank of India company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Abbey company.

In the current year, Bank of India company and Abbey company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bank of India company nor Abbey company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bank of India company nor Abbey company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bank of India company nor Abbey company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Abbey company nor Bank of India company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Abbey nor Bank of India holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Abbey company nor Bank of India company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Abbey company and Bank of India company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Abbey nor Bank of India holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Abbey nor Bank of India holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Abbey nor Bank of India holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Abbey nor Bank of India holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Abbey nor Bank of India holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Abbey nor Bank of India holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Marshmallow is a lightweight library for converting complex objects to and from simple Python datatypes. In versions from 3.0.0rc1 to before 3.26.2 and from 4.0.0 to before 4.1.2, Schema.load(data, many=True) is vulnerable to denial of service attacks. A moderately sized request can consume a disproportionate amount of CPU time. This issue has been patched in version 3.26.2 and 4.1.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

KEDA is a Kubernetes-based Event Driven Autoscaling component. Prior to versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3, an Arbitrary File Read vulnerability has been identified in KEDA, potentially affecting any KEDA resource that uses TriggerAuthentication to configure HashiCorp Vault authentication. The vulnerability stems from an incorrect or insufficient path validation when loading the Service Account Token specified in spec.hashiCorpVault.credential.serviceAccount. An attacker with permissions to create or modify a TriggerAuthentication resource can exfiltrate the content of any file from the node's filesystem (where the KEDA pod resides) by directing the file's content to a server under their control, as part of the Vault authentication request. The potential impact includes the exfiltration of sensitive system information, such as secrets, keys, or the content of files like /etc/passwd. This issue has been patched in versions 2.17.3 and 2.18.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Fedify is a TypeScript library for building federated server apps powered by ActivityPub. Prior to versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2, a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) vulnerability exists in Fedify's document loader. The HTML parsing regex at packages/fedify/src/runtime/docloader.ts:259 contains nested quantifiers that cause catastrophic backtracking when processing maliciously crafted HTML responses. This issue has been patched in versions 1.6.13, 1.7.14, 1.8.15, and 1.9.2.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) in PluXml CMS 5.8.22 allows an attacker with administrator panel access to inject a malicious PHP webshell into a theme file (e.g., home.php).

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Xiongmai XM530 IP cameras on firmware V5.00.R02.000807D8.10010.346624.S.ONVIF 21.06. The GetStreamUri exposes RTSP URIs containing hardcoded credentials enabling direct unauthorized video stream access.

Published
Date
2025-12-22
Updated
Date
2025-12-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References