Comparison Overview

ABACLE

VS

Betters Law Firm PLLC

ABACLE

321 N Clark St, Chicago, US
Last Update: 2025-11-30

Only the American Bar Association offers high-quality CLE in such a comprehensive range of relevant topics to benefit every legal professional across the nation. ABA members enjoy free CLE as part of their member benefit. So if you’re required by your state to earn CLE credits, or if you want to stay current on the latest legal developments and opportunities, choose CLE from the ABA. ABACLE is guided by the Standing Committee on Continuing Legal Education and works closely with experts from the ABA Sections and other entities and from the profession at large in developing programs and products. It serves as the central resource for the ABA and the profession for up-to-the-minute, quality CLE distributed through a variety of convenient formats.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Betters Law Firm PLLC

800 Town & Country Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77024, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Betters Law Firm offers comprehensive default and mortgage services nationwide. We provide the convenient service you want with the professional attention every legal matter deserves. Through our vetted network of licensed local counsel in all 50 states and U.S. territories, we ensure your legal solution satisfies the specific standards of your state and jurisdiction. Our legal solutions are customized to your needs and competitive in price, making us a far greater value than the websites churning out generic documents.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abacle.jpeg
ABACLE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/betters-law-firm-pllc.jpeg
Betters Law Firm PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ABACLE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Betters Law Firm PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABACLE in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Betters Law Firm PLLC in 2025.

Incident History — ABACLE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABACLE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Betters Law Firm PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Betters Law Firm PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abacle.jpeg
ABACLE
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/betters-law-firm-pllc.jpeg
Betters Law Firm PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ABACLE company and Betters Law Firm PLLC company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

ABACLE company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Betters Law Firm PLLC company has not reported any.

In the current year, Betters Law Firm PLLC company and ABACLE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Betters Law Firm PLLC company nor ABACLE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

ABACLE company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Betters Law Firm PLLC company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Betters Law Firm PLLC company nor ABACLE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ABACLE company nor Betters Law Firm PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ABACLE nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ABACLE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Betters Law Firm PLLC company.

Neither ABACLE nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ABACLE nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ABACLE nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ABACLE nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ABACLE nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ABACLE nor Betters Law Firm PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X