Comparison Overview

Aarhus Universitet

VS

CSIC

Aarhus Universitet

Nordre Ringgade 1 DK- Aarhus, Aarhus, undefined, 8000, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Aarhus Universitet blev grundlagt i 1928 og er i dag i den absolutte verdenselite på flere forskningsfelter. Aarhus Universitet (AU) er blandt verdens 10 bedste universiteter grundlagt inden for de seneste 100 år og har en lang tradition for partnerskaber med nogle af verdens bedste forskningsinstitutioner og universitetsnetværk. Gennem samarbejde med myndigheder og erhvervsliv har AU et stærkt engagement i samfundsudviklingen. AU har som mål at bidrage til at løse de globale og komplekse udfordringer, som verden står over for. Derfor tilstræber universitetet at forene forskernes høje faglighed med samarbejde på tværs af faggrænser for at kombinere forskning på nye måder. Det sker i tæt kontakt med verden omkring os og skaber grundlag for, at universitetet er internationalt konkurrencedygtigt inden for forskning, uddannelser, talentudvikling og videnudveksling.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,903
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CSIC

Calle de Serrano, 117 Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid 28006, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The Spanish National Research Council (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-CSIC) is a government agency for basic and applied scientific research. It is the largest public research performing organisation in Spain, with 126 centers. El Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) es el mayor organismo público de investigación de España. Su objetivo es desarrollar y promover investigaciones en beneficio del progreso científico y tecnológico. Agrupa 120 centros e institutos de investigación que abarcan prácticamente todas las áreas del conocimiento. Está adscrito al Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aarhus-university-denmark-.jpeg
Aarhus Universitet
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/csic.jpeg
CSIC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aarhus Universitet
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CSIC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aarhus Universitet in 2025.

Incidents vs Research Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSIC in 2025.

Incident History — Aarhus Universitet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aarhus Universitet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CSIC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSIC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aarhus-university-denmark-.jpeg
Aarhus Universitet
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/csic.jpeg
CSIC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aarhus Universitet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CSIC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CSIC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Aarhus Universitet company.

In the current year, CSIC company and Aarhus Universitet company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CSIC company nor Aarhus Universitet company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CSIC company nor Aarhus Universitet company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CSIC company nor Aarhus Universitet company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Aarhus Universitet company nor CSIC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aarhus Universitet nor CSIC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aarhus Universitet company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CSIC company.

Aarhus Universitet company employs more people globally than CSIC company, reflecting its scale as a Research.

Neither Aarhus Universitet nor CSIC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aarhus Universitet nor CSIC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aarhus Universitet nor CSIC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aarhus Universitet nor CSIC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aarhus Universitet nor CSIC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aarhus Universitet nor CSIC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H