Comparison Overview

A4 Graphic

VS

SmithPrint, Inc.

A4 Graphic

3362 Coral Way, Miami, FL, 33145, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.a4graphic.com

Your One-Stop for all of your marketing and publicity needs A versatile Graphic Design company for all your commercial needs with an emphasis in client satisfaction, brand awareness and competitive pricing for all your online and offline marketing demands. How far are you willing to go? Let our experts assist and guide you in your business vision and find a perfect solution for your budget. THE PRINTING AND SIGNAGE COMPANY Full service printing company, offering the highest quality product and fastest turnaround times for Publicity Handouts, Advertisement Specialties, Corporate forms and Office needs, Multi-Page Prints, Event Materials, Art and Info Wide Format, Promotional Products and much more... Custom signs and displays made with the utmost dedication and workmanship. - ADA Signs - Way Finding Systems - Exhibition Displays - Structural Signs - Store Fronts - Vehicle Wrap and more... Web Design 5 Star websites for start up companies and businesses. Let your website speak for itself.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

SmithPrint, Inc.

333 Burnet St, San Antonio, 78202, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.smithprint.net

Barney Smith, CEO of SmithPrint, Inc., established a family-owned and operated business in 1995. He recognized the marketplace needed a resource offering a single source for integrated printing and marketing solutions. More importantly, he knew companies were seeking a partner with the personal touch; one that could provide modern "big city"​ services combined with hard-to-find "small town"​ values of integrity, trust, and pride in a job well done. Throughout the years, Barney's customer-focused strategy has served as SmithPrint's operational blueprint. It is directly responsible for the company's continual growth and accomplishments. In 2009, Barney's wife, Cece—a successful marketing expert—joined the team. She and Barney recognized the opportunity to grow their business into a cross media marketing company that can meet the needs of businesses small to large. Every day, SmithPrint employees work together as a team to ensure projects are completed on time, within budget, and to the complete satisfaction of every customer. SmithPrint's mission is to turn dreams and visions into realities. We do this by becoming a "roll up our sleeves"​ partner who truly cares about the long-term success of the people we serve.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a4-graphic.jpeg
A4 Graphic
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smithprint.jpeg
SmithPrint, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A4 Graphic
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SmithPrint, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A4 Graphic in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SmithPrint, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — A4 Graphic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A4 Graphic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SmithPrint, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SmithPrint, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a4-graphic.jpeg
A4 Graphic
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smithprint.jpeg
SmithPrint, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A4 Graphic company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SmithPrint, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SmithPrint, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A4 Graphic company.

In the current year, SmithPrint, Inc. company and A4 Graphic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SmithPrint, Inc. company nor A4 Graphic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SmithPrint, Inc. company nor A4 Graphic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SmithPrint, Inc. company nor A4 Graphic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A4 Graphic company nor SmithPrint, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A4 Graphic nor SmithPrint, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A4 Graphic company nor SmithPrint, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SmithPrint, Inc. company employs more people globally than A4 Graphic company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither A4 Graphic nor SmithPrint, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A4 Graphic nor SmithPrint, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A4 Graphic nor SmithPrint, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A4 Graphic nor SmithPrint, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A4 Graphic nor SmithPrint, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A4 Graphic nor SmithPrint, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References