Comparison Overview

LineSpex

VS

able. | afca

LineSpex

1240 N VAN BUREN ST, ANAHEIM, CA, 92807, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For the past 24 years, Linespex has provided HD productivity cameras and solutions that have built on the reputation of being "dependable and reliable"​, hence our continuing success of expanding market throughout the US and Internationally. Our customer base includes many of North America (and the worlds) leading consumer product manufacturers! We are committed to providing highly efficient productivity cameras for automated manufacturing and lean production lines; delivering exceptional customer service with extensive product knowledge and training, technical and marketing support. Our goal is to provide the best investments to make your businesses better. We want our customers to grow with us and move forward.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

able. | afca

4 bis rue Henri Becquerel, GENAS, undefined, 69740, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

able. | afca conçoit et fabrique des armoires de commande pour portes et portails industriels, collectifs et domestiques et dispose d'un atelier de câblage pour la réalisation de coffrets spécifiques. Représentant de la marque V2, fabricant de motorisations pour portes, portails et volets roulants avec tous les asservissements (cellules, émetteurs, etc...). Fort d'une excellente expérience de distribution, nous commercialisons également des accessoires de portails (galet nylon, roue, rail, etc...) et toute une gamme de produits pour la maison intelligente.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a1webcams-inc-.jpeg
LineSpex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afca.jpeg
able. | afca
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
LineSpex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
able. | afca
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LineSpex in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for able. | afca in 2025.

Incident History — LineSpex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LineSpex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — able. | afca (X = Date, Y = Severity)

able. | afca cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a1webcams-inc-.jpeg
LineSpex
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afca.jpeg
able. | afca
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both LineSpex company and able. | afca company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, able. | afca company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to LineSpex company.

In the current year, able. | afca company and LineSpex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither able. | afca company nor LineSpex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither able. | afca company nor LineSpex company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither able. | afca company nor LineSpex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither LineSpex company nor able. | afca company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither LineSpex nor able. | afca holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither LineSpex company nor able. | afca company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

able. | afca company employs more people globally than LineSpex company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither LineSpex nor able. | afca holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither LineSpex nor able. | afca holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither LineSpex nor able. | afca holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither LineSpex nor able. | afca holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither LineSpex nor able. | afca holds HIPAA certification.

Neither LineSpex nor able. | afca holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H