Comparison Overview

A1 Telekom Austria Group

VS

Motorola Solutions

A1 Telekom Austria Group

Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

WE ARE EMPOWERING DIGITAL LIFE We don't know how the world will look like in 2050, but we know that A1 Telekom Austria Group is geared up for current and future demands. We are a leading provider of digital services and communications solutions in Central and Eastern Europe, offering a state-of-the art network infrastructure as well as empowering digitalization. 19.000 of our employees and modern broadband infrastructure make digital business and lifestyle possible as well as enable more than 24 mio users to connect everywhere anytime. Our purpose is to Empower Digital Life in areas of communications, payment, entertainment services and integrated business solutions. We do this together with our operating companies in 7 European countries: Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Slovenia, Belarus, Republic of Serbia and Republic of North Macedonia. Headquartered in Vienna and listed on the Vienna Stock Exchange, the A1 Telekom Austria Group is an European unit of América Móvil, one of the world´s largest wireless services providers. You can follow us also here: https://twitter.com/TA_Group Find out more about us as employer on https://jobs.a1.com/

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 11,462
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Motorola Solutions

500 W. Monroe Street, Chicago, IL, US, 60661
Last Update: 2025-11-23

About Motorola Solutions | Solving for safer Safety and security are at the heart of everything we do at Motorola Solutions. We build and connect technologies to help protect people, property and places. Our solutions foster the collaboration that’s critical for safer communities, safer schools, safer hospitals, safer businesses, and ultimately, safer nations. Learn more about our commitment to innovating for a safer future for us all at www.motorolasolutions.com.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 25,588
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a1-telekom-austria-group.jpeg
A1 Telekom Austria Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motorolasolutions.jpeg
Motorola Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A1 Telekom Austria Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Motorola Solutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A1 Telekom Austria Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

Motorola Solutions has 238.98% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — A1 Telekom Austria Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A1 Telekom Austria Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Motorola Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Motorola Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a1-telekom-austria-group.jpeg
A1 Telekom Austria Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/motorolasolutions.jpeg
Motorola Solutions
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Motorola Solutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A1 Telekom Austria Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

A1 Telekom Austria Group and Motorola Solutions have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Motorola Solutions company has reported more cyber incidents than A1 Telekom Austria Group company.

Neither Motorola Solutions company nor A1 Telekom Austria Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Motorola Solutions company and A1 Telekom Austria Group company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Motorola Solutions company nor A1 Telekom Austria Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Motorola Solutions company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while A1 Telekom Austria Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither A1 Telekom Austria Group nor Motorola Solutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both Motorola Solutions company and A1 Telekom Austria Group company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Motorola Solutions company employs more people globally than A1 Telekom Austria Group company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither A1 Telekom Austria Group nor Motorola Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A1 Telekom Austria Group nor Motorola Solutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A1 Telekom Austria Group nor Motorola Solutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A1 Telekom Austria Group nor Motorola Solutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A1 Telekom Austria Group nor Motorola Solutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A1 Telekom Austria Group nor Motorola Solutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H