Comparison Overview

A.E.Landes Photography

VS

fivefourstudios

A.E.Landes Photography

undefined, West Springfield, VA, 22152, US
Last Update: 2025-12-16

A.E.Landes Photography is an architectural photographer and project media production company based in the DC Metro Area. We create exciting and original visual imagery used by firms to win design awards, bid on future projects, and stand out from the competing firms in their marketing campaigns. We clearly portray our clients' vision and design execution as beautiful spaces for work and life.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

fivefourstudios

54 Oldfield Road, Manchester, M5 4JZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 700 and 749

fivefourstudios, a 1970’s warehouse transformed into a state of the photographic studio and event space. The building has been renovated and reopened by David Oldham, a world-famous fashion and beauty photographer and Emma Stamp, who brings over twenty years fashion retail and hospitality management to the business. David’s aspiration was to create the perfect photographic studio both in a practical and aesthetic sense, and it is his style and attention to detail which has made this a reality. Restoring much of the original industrial features and adding a touch of decadence, the result is an elegant mix of styles from the scandi-minimalism of the loft to the opulence of the bar and lounge. The unique venue set over three floors consists of three pure white studios, one full daylight studio and two with infinity coves, a bar and lounge. The studios have served a number of high-end clients, including Manchester United and Manchester City football clubs, Morrisons, Footasylum, New Balance, Team GB, Oxfam, NSPCC, Metrolink and Adidas, and the fivefourteam are now turning their creative skill, operational expertise and excellent client service to events.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a.e.landes-photography.jpeg
A.E.Landes Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fivefourstudios.jpeg
fivefourstudios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A.E.Landes Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
fivefourstudios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A.E.Landes Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for fivefourstudios in 2025.

Incident History — A.E.Landes Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A.E.Landes Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — fivefourstudios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

fivefourstudios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a.e.landes-photography.jpeg
A.E.Landes Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fivefourstudios.jpeg
fivefourstudios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A.E.Landes Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to fivefourstudios company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, fivefourstudios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A.E.Landes Photography company.

In the current year, fivefourstudios company and A.E.Landes Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither fivefourstudios company nor A.E.Landes Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither fivefourstudios company nor A.E.Landes Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither fivefourstudios company nor A.E.Landes Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography company nor fivefourstudios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography nor fivefourstudios holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography company nor fivefourstudios company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

fivefourstudios company employs more people globally than A.E.Landes Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography nor fivefourstudios holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography nor fivefourstudios holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography nor fivefourstudios holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography nor fivefourstudios holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography nor fivefourstudios holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A.E.Landes Photography nor fivefourstudios holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L