Comparison Overview

A. O. Smith Corporation

VS

Ternium

A. O. Smith Corporation

11270 W. Park Place, Milwaukee, WI, 53224, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating its 150th year of business, A. O. Smith is a leading global water technology and manufacturing company that proudly employs more than 12,000 people who together provide water heating and water treatment solutions. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, China, India, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The company also has sales and distribution in more than 60 countries around the world. As a global water technology leader, A. O. Smith applies innovative technology and energy-efficient solutions to products marketed worldwide. Our focus is on building this platform through new product development, global expansion, strategic acquisitions and partnerships.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,704
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ternium

Av. Guerrero Nte. No. 151 Col. Cuauhtémoc San Nicolás de los Garza, Monterrey, Nuevo León, undefined, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Ternium (NYSE:TX) is the largest steel producer in Latin America. With production centers in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, the United States, Guatemala, and Mexico, Ternium has an extensive network of service and distribution centers in the continent, in addition to participating in the control group of Usiminas, a leading company in the Brazilian steel market. More than 21,400 people throughout the Americas make up a multicultural and highly-qualified team and are the foundation for an industrial project with a production capacity of 12.3 million tons of crude steel per year. A strong integration of the production process, industrial excellence, and constant innovation are part of our identity and drive Ternium's growth along with its extensive value chain, with customers and suppliers from industries such as construction, automotive, household appliances, capital goods, packaging, food, and energy. Thanks to digital transformation, research, development processes, as well as the creation of new products with the highest technology, today we are at the forefront of the steel industry, which has an important role to play in the sustainable development of our societies. Every day, in every part of the continent where we work, we grow together with communities, and we seek to support our commitment to safety and the environment in everything we do.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 10,504
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a.-o.-smith-corporation.jpeg
A. O. Smith Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ternium.jpeg
Ternium
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A. O. Smith Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ternium
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A. O. Smith Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ternium in 2025.

Incident History — A. O. Smith Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A. O. Smith Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ternium (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ternium cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a.-o.-smith-corporation.jpeg
A. O. Smith Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ternium.jpeg
Ternium
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ternium company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A. O. Smith Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ternium company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A. O. Smith Corporation company.

In the current year, Ternium company and A. O. Smith Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ternium company nor A. O. Smith Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ternium company nor A. O. Smith Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ternium company nor A. O. Smith Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation company nor Ternium company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Ternium holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

A. O. Smith Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Ternium company.

A. O. Smith Corporation company employs more people globally than Ternium company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Ternium holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Ternium holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Ternium holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Ternium holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Ternium holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Ternium holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H