Comparison Overview

A. O. Smith Corporation

VS

Arçelik Türkiye

A. O. Smith Corporation

11270 W. Park Place, Milwaukee, WI, 53224, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating its 150th year of business, A. O. Smith is a leading global water technology and manufacturing company that proudly employs more than 12,000 people who together provide water heating and water treatment solutions. The company is headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, with operations in the United States, Canada, Mexico, China, India, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. The company also has sales and distribution in more than 60 countries around the world. As a global water technology leader, A. O. Smith applies innovative technology and energy-efficient solutions to products marketed worldwide. Our focus is on building this platform through new product development, global expansion, strategic acquisitions and partnerships.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 13,704
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Arçelik Türkiye

Karaağaç Caddesi, İstanbul, Sütlüce/Beyoğlu, 34445, TR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Arçelik Türkiye olarak, "Dünyaya Saygılı Dünyada Saygın" misyonuyla yola çıkıyoruz ve teknoloji, insan kaynağı ve üretim gücümüzü sürdürülebilir bir gelecek için kullanıyoruz. 1955 yılında başlayan yolculuğumuz bugün, 22 marka, 46 üretim tesisi, 55.000 çalışan ve 58 ülkedeki 125 iştirak ile global bir varlık olarak devam ediyor. Arçelik markaları arasında Arçelik, Beko, Whirlpool*, Grundig, Hotpoint, Arctic, Ariston*, Leisure, Indesit, Blomberg, Defy, Dawlance, Hitachi*, Voltas Beko, Singer, ElektraBregenz, Flavel, Bauknecht, Privileg, Altus, Ignis ve Polar bulunmaktadır. Vizyonumuz, kendimizi sürekli yenileyerek ve sektörümüzde liderliği sürdürerek, dijitalleşen hanelerin ve şirketlerin güvenilir çözüm ortağı olmaktır. 31 Ar-Ge ve Tasarım Merkezi ile inovasyon ve sürdürülebilirlik konularında öncü rol oynamaktayız. *Limitli marka kullanım hakkına sahiptir.

NAICS: 339
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11,197
Subsidiaries: 52
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a.-o.-smith-corporation.jpeg
A. O. Smith Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcelikturkiye.jpeg
Arçelik Türkiye
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A. O. Smith Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Arçelik Türkiye
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A. O. Smith Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arçelik Türkiye in 2025.

Incident History — A. O. Smith Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A. O. Smith Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Arçelik Türkiye (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arçelik Türkiye cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a.-o.-smith-corporation.jpeg
A. O. Smith Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/arcelikturkiye.jpeg
Arçelik Türkiye
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Arçelik Türkiye company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A. O. Smith Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Arçelik Türkiye company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A. O. Smith Corporation company.

In the current year, Arçelik Türkiye company and A. O. Smith Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Arçelik Türkiye company nor A. O. Smith Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Arçelik Türkiye company nor A. O. Smith Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Arçelik Türkiye company nor A. O. Smith Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation company nor Arçelik Türkiye company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Arçelik Türkiye holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Arçelik Türkiye company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to A. O. Smith Corporation company.

A. O. Smith Corporation company employs more people globally than Arçelik Türkiye company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Arçelik Türkiye holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Arçelik Türkiye holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Arçelik Türkiye holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Arçelik Türkiye holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Arçelik Türkiye holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A. O. Smith Corporation nor Arçelik Türkiye holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H