Comparison Overview

A Ziemba Design

VS

Good Witch Graphics

A Ziemba Design

undefined, Portsmouth, NH, 03801, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.aziembadesign.com

Creative solutions for start-ups in need of generating a brand presence. Supplemental design assistance for agencies and established businesses. The goal is to help clients build strong visual identities and create effective marketing materials. I equip each client with the tools they need to confidently promote and grow their business. Whether working with emerging companies or well-established brands, I bring the same level of creativity, adaptability, and strategic thinking to every project.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Good Witch Graphics

Palmer, TX, US, 75152
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.goodwitchgraphics.com

Before opening my own company in 2009, I worked for almost two decades as a graphic designer at a post production facility, designing stationery and business cards, advertisements, web sites, logos for print and broadcast, and even hand-making props for high-definition video productions. My special design skill is rebuilding logos in vector format. I have experience creating flat vector logos (appropriate for use in 3D software programs, for promotional products such as silkscreened or embroidered t-shirts, and for imprinted items such as mugs or pens). I can also create "dimensional" logos with gradients, bevels, highlights and shadows. Having experience in art is a definite plus when it comes to graphic design. I've learned to minimize page elements so the focal point doesn't get lost. I always strive to create a balanced composition with a sense of movement and color harmony. I am continually updating my artistic skills, experimenting with new media and substrates... this practice keeps my art fresh and ever-evolving. My favorite medium is oil, but I also enjoy oil pastel, acrylics, watercolor pencil and mixed media (compositions with cut paper, fabric, metal and paint). Every piece of artwork I create is made to last for generations, so I always use high-quality paints and substrates as well as acid-free papers.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 0
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-ziemba-design.jpeg
A Ziemba Design
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Good Witch Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A Ziemba Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Good Witch Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Ziemba Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Good Witch Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — A Ziemba Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Ziemba Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Good Witch Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Good Witch Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-ziemba-design.jpeg
A Ziemba Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Good Witch Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Good Witch Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A Ziemba Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Good Witch Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A Ziemba Design company.

In the current year, Good Witch Graphics company and A Ziemba Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Good Witch Graphics company nor A Ziemba Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Good Witch Graphics company nor A Ziemba Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Good Witch Graphics company nor A Ziemba Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A Ziemba Design company nor Good Witch Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A Ziemba Design nor Good Witch Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A Ziemba Design company nor Good Witch Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

A Ziemba Design company employs more people globally than Good Witch Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither A Ziemba Design nor Good Witch Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A Ziemba Design nor Good Witch Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A Ziemba Design nor Good Witch Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A Ziemba Design nor Good Witch Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A Ziemba Design nor Good Witch Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A Ziemba Design nor Good Witch Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References