Comparison Overview

A Public Space

VS

Editorial Ink

A Public Space

PO Box B, New York, New York 10159, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.apublicspace.org

A Public Space is the nonprofit and independent home of an eponymous award-winning literary, arts, and culture magazine, APS Books, and APS Academy. Under the direction of founding editor Brigid Hughes since 2006, it has been our mission to seek out overlooked and unclassifiable work, and to publish writing from beyond established confines. Made in Brooklyn. Subscribe today, and join the conversation.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Editorial Ink

Santa Fe,, Distrito Federal, 01210, MX
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.editorialink.com

[email protected] ESPAÑOL Editorial Ink, primera editorial mexicana 100% digital. Forbes la reconoce como pionera de eBooks en México. Con presencia mundial en Amazon, Apple, B&N, Google Play y Kobo. Ofrece servicios digitales como la única de habla hispana certificada por Apple como casa convertidora, agregadora de contenido y distribuidora. Reinventando el arte de leer. INGLÉS Editorial Ink, first 100% digital Mexican publishing house. Recognized by Forbes as the eBook pioneer in Mexico. With worldwide presence in Amazon, Apple, B&N, Google Play and Kobo. Offers digital services as the only Spanish-speaking conversion house, content aggregator and distributor certified by Apple. Reinventing the art of reading.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-public-space.jpeg
A Public Space
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-ink.jpeg
Editorial Ink
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A Public Space
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Editorial Ink
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Public Space in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Editorial Ink in 2025.

Incident History — A Public Space (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Public Space cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Editorial Ink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Editorial Ink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-public-space.jpeg
A Public Space
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/editorial-ink.jpeg
Editorial Ink
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Editorial Ink company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A Public Space company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Editorial Ink company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A Public Space company.

In the current year, Editorial Ink company and A Public Space company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Editorial Ink company nor A Public Space company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Editorial Ink company nor A Public Space company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Editorial Ink company nor A Public Space company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A Public Space company nor Editorial Ink company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A Public Space nor Editorial Ink holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A Public Space company nor Editorial Ink company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

A Public Space company employs more people globally than Editorial Ink company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither A Public Space nor Editorial Ink holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A Public Space nor Editorial Ink holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A Public Space nor Editorial Ink holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A Public Space nor Editorial Ink holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A Public Space nor Editorial Ink holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A Public Space nor Editorial Ink holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References