A P Moller Maersk group
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
None
NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Comparison Overview
A P Moller Maersk group
VS
Haleon
Haleon
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
You have loved and trusted our brands for over 170 years. We have a clear purpose, to deliver better everyday health with humanity. 💚 Our category-leading brands include Sensodyne, Panadol, Centrum, TUMS, Advil, Otrivin and Voltaren. We combine deep human understanding and trusted science to make everyday health more inclusive, more achievable and more sustainable. Want to learn more about us? Follow to stay up to date!
NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
A P Moller Maersk group
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Haleon
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A P Moller Maersk group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Haleon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for A P Moller Maersk group in 2025.
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Haleon in 2025.
Incident History — A P Moller Maersk group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
A P Moller Maersk group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Haleon (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Haleon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
A P Moller Maersk group
Incidents
Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious ransomware
Motivation: Ransom payment
Blog: Blog
Haleon
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
Haleon company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A P Moller Maersk group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
A P Moller Maersk group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Haleon company has not reported any.
In the current year, Haleon company and A P Moller Maersk group company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither Haleon company nor A P Moller Maersk group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither Haleon company nor A P Moller Maersk group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
A P Moller Maersk group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Haleon company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group company nor Haleon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Haleon holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Haleon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to A P Moller Maersk group company.
Haleon company employs more people globally than A P Moller Maersk group company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Haleon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Haleon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Haleon holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Haleon holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Haleon holds HIPAA certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Haleon holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description
A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
