Comparison Overview

A New Start, Inc.

VS

Center for Change

A New Start, Inc.

1261 S Congress Avenue, Palm Springs, FL, 33406, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

A New Start, Inc. is an intensive outpatient treatment program facility in West Palm Beach, Florida. We address psychological, emotional, and behavioral components of addiction while simultaneously treating co-occuing disorders to achieve long term sobriety. Our team of specialists at our addiction treatment facility work with patients in a clean, comfortable environment while providing specialized care for co-morbid disorders such as anxiety, depressions, low self-worth, and process addictions related to trauma, body image, eating disorders, gambling, anger resolution, grief and loss, and so much more. In order to best serve our clients, we utilize the most recent evidence based practices from psychology, medicine as well as historically proven methods including cognitive behavioral therapy, 12 step recovery model, motivational interviewing and family systems therapy. At our addiction treatment facility, patients are provided a place where they can seek the support and therapies needed to aid in their recovery. Group therapy rooms are available for therapy sessions, as well as lounging areas and a dining area. We will also arrange for transportation as needed for patients to and from our IOP facility.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Change

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Center for Change offers a wide continuum of evidence-based services in English and Spanish for criminal justice clients ranging from weekly contacts (group or individual) to up to 8 hours per week of enhanced services. We cater to clients who have received DUIs, clients that are on probation, parole or TASC for non-DUI related charges, and clients that are seeking to change their addictive behavior. Center for Change uses a harm reduction approach to relapse and recidivism prevention. Treatment is based on the integration of four evidence-based practices – Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Motivational Interviewing, Relapse Prevention and Social Network Enhancement. Our staff have been working in the criminal justice field for over 10 years and are dedicated to serving this population. We are passionate about helping people change and as such are committed to keeping up with the latest research while not losing sight of the most important factor that drives change – a positive working relationship.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 167
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-new-start-inc-.jpeg
A New Start, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Center for Change
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A New Start, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Change
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A New Start, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Change in 2026.

Incident History — A New Start, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A New Start, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Change (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Change cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-new-start-inc-.jpeg
A New Start, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Center for Change
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for Change company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A New Start, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for Change company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A New Start, Inc. company.

In the current year, Center for Change company and A New Start, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Change company nor A New Start, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Change company nor A New Start, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Change company nor A New Start, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A New Start, Inc. company nor Center for Change company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A New Start, Inc. nor Center for Change holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A New Start, Inc. company nor Center for Change company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Change company employs more people globally than A New Start, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither A New Start, Inc. nor Center for Change holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A New Start, Inc. nor Center for Change holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A New Start, Inc. nor Center for Change holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A New Start, Inc. nor Center for Change holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A New Start, Inc. nor Center for Change holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A New Start, Inc. nor Center for Change holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N