Comparison Overview

A-Lex Print & Promotion

VS

MCA – NetPub, Inc

A-Lex Print & Promotion

1200 High Street, Suite 204, None, Pottstown , Pa, US, 19464
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Since our debut, A-lex Print & Promotion has been totally focused on getting our customers the highest quality and best value while providing the most superb customer service. UNBEATABLE PRICING Our goal is to get you the best pricing on all your printing, creative, and promotional needs. We work with many vendors nationally and have access to thousands of promotional suppliers across the country. WE DO THE WORK SO YOU DONT HAVE TO!!! IMPECCABLE SERVICE We make it a priority to ensure that your project is delivered on time! We pride ourselves on our renowned customer service. Give us a call, you will ALWAYS speak to a LIVE person. RESOURCES We have multiple resources for all printing needs, from business cards to banners to mailing services. We have over 850,000 promotional products available and offer free samples on many of our products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MCA – NetPub, Inc

675 Dutchess Turnpike, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

MCA – NetPub, Inc, Incorporated is an award-winning on-demand printing, publishing, storage and fulfillment company with over 25 years of experience in the book and manual printing business. We are an independently owned facility, headquartered in Poughkeepsie, New York. MCA – NetPub, Inc Track Record: -Book Business Magazine named NetPublications, Inc one of the Top 20 Leading Digital Book Printers. -Article on NetPublications, Inc. - Digital book publisher thrives in Hudson Valley (PDF), Hudson Valley Business Journal, 2009 -Recipient of the Print on Demand Innovation Leadership Award -NetPublications'​ president awarded the Print On Demand Pioneer Award -Ranked 2nd for Total Paid Impressions in Print on Demand Magazine, and ranked as a Print On Demand Top Site for the fifth time in as many years. -Developed patented, award-winning Print-On-Demand solution: Printway.com -One of only three vendors to beta-test the latest Print On Demand technology. -Alliances with major technology providers. -Over One Billion impressions printed. -Publishing partners include major publishing organizations and multi-national service organizations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-lex-print-&-promotion.jpeg
A-Lex Print & Promotion
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netpublications-inc.jpeg
MCA – NetPub, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A-Lex Print & Promotion
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MCA – NetPub, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A-Lex Print & Promotion in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCA – NetPub, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — A-Lex Print & Promotion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A-Lex Print & Promotion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MCA – NetPub, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCA – NetPub, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-lex-print-&-promotion.jpeg
A-Lex Print & Promotion
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netpublications-inc.jpeg
MCA – NetPub, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MCA – NetPub, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A-Lex Print & Promotion company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MCA – NetPub, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A-Lex Print & Promotion company.

In the current year, MCA – NetPub, Inc company and A-Lex Print & Promotion company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MCA – NetPub, Inc company nor A-Lex Print & Promotion company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MCA – NetPub, Inc company nor A-Lex Print & Promotion company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MCA – NetPub, Inc company nor A-Lex Print & Promotion company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion company nor MCA – NetPub, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion company nor MCA – NetPub, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MCA – NetPub, Inc company employs more people globally than A-Lex Print & Promotion company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A-Lex Print & Promotion nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N