Comparison Overview

A Home Within

VS

New Haven Residential Treatment Center

A Home Within

195 41st St, Oakland, California, 94611, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

One Foster Youth. One Therapist. For As Long As It Takes. Our vision is that all children who experience foster care are provided this essential support, ensuring that as they transition from foster care, regardless of which stage of life they are in, they have the inner tools they need to thrive. By matching youth with experienced therapists, we address the trauma and disruption inherent to foster care, help youth manage stress and anxiety, and develop the inner tools they need to become healthy adults. With a mission to create and support lasting, caring relationships for children and youth in foster care, A Home Within identifies, recruits, trains, and supports a network of licensed therapists who each provide free, weekly, one-to-one therapy to a single foster youth "for as long as it takes." For foster youth who often watch people move in and out of their lives, our model creates an anchor of support.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 77
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

New Haven Residential Treatment Center

2172 E 7200 S, Spanish Fork, Utah, 84660, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
Between 750 and 799

New Haven Residential Treatment Center offers a unique residential treatment program that uses a relationship based approach to help adolescent girls achieve positive change and growth through academic, therapeutic, and everyday experiences. We are located in Spanish Fork and Saratoga Springs, Utah. If you are interested in working at New Haven Residential Treatment Center, please view our current job openings at: https://www.newhavenrtc.com/careers/.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 181
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-home-within.jpeg
A Home Within
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-haven-residential-treatment-center.jpeg
New Haven Residential Treatment Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A Home Within
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
New Haven Residential Treatment Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Home Within in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for New Haven Residential Treatment Center in 2026.

Incident History — A Home Within (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Home Within cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — New Haven Residential Treatment Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

New Haven Residential Treatment Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-home-within.jpeg
A Home Within
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/new-haven-residential-treatment-center.jpeg
New Haven Residential Treatment Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

New Haven Residential Treatment Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A Home Within company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, New Haven Residential Treatment Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A Home Within company.

In the current year, New Haven Residential Treatment Center company and A Home Within company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither New Haven Residential Treatment Center company nor A Home Within company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither New Haven Residential Treatment Center company nor A Home Within company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither New Haven Residential Treatment Center company nor A Home Within company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A Home Within company nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A Home Within nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A Home Within company nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

New Haven Residential Treatment Center company employs more people globally than A Home Within company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither A Home Within nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A Home Within nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A Home Within nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A Home Within nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A Home Within nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A Home Within nor New Haven Residential Treatment Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H