Comparison Overview

A Better Image Printing

VS

OEC Graphics

A Better Image Printing

1709 Legion Road, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abetterimageprinting.com

If you can imagine it, we can print it. Here at A Better Image Printing, we utilize all latest technologies and professional equipment from the leading companies in the industry to assure both fast turnaround and exceptional quality. Because we have the capabilities to produce everything in our Chapel Hill facility, we deliver on-time performance, and outstanding service. Always on-time and on budget. We offer professional graphic design, large format, digital printing, one to four-color traditional offset printing, bindery, delivery, fulfillment, storage, mailing and much more. GREEN PLUS CERTIFIED PICA award 2011

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

OEC Graphics

555 W Waukau Ave, Oshkosh, WI, 54902, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.oecgraphics.com

OEC Graphics, Inc. is a full service, vertically integrated premedia company and globally recognized expert in flexography. OEC has always been driven by technology and opportunity since its inception in 1912. Family owned, OEC is leading the way in the prepress industry with our Seamex® seamless sleeves, HD-ITR, Flat Top Dot capabilities and custom digital asset management programs. Through expansion both geographically and into related markets, OEC services all of North America through ten full service locations and six additional remote facilities. The company has grown its product portfolio to include brand services and services the large format display graphics industry with production of signage, point-of-purchase and finishing services. OEC is strongly positioned as a single source partner for all of your graphics needs. Operations: • Ten state-of-the-art Locations - Oshkosh, WI - Appleton, WI - Chicago, IL - Atlanta, GA - San Francisco, CA - Los Angeles, CA - Carolinas - Portland, OR - Vancouver, BC - Salt Lake City, UT • 6 remote facilities • 12 CTP devices • 17 plate processing units • Over 250,000 square feet of facilities Specialties Brand Design, Language and Strategy, In-Store Messaging, Pre-Media, Workflow Management, Color Management, Coating Plates, Photopolymer Plates and Seamex® Sleeves, Pressroom Audits, Technical Support

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 173
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-better-image-printing.jpeg
A Better Image Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oec-graphics.jpeg
OEC Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A Better Image Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
OEC Graphics
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Better Image Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for OEC Graphics in 2025.

Incident History — A Better Image Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Better Image Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — OEC Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

OEC Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-better-image-printing.jpeg
A Better Image Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/oec-graphics.jpeg
OEC Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

A Better Image Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to OEC Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, OEC Graphics company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A Better Image Printing company.

In the current year, OEC Graphics company and A Better Image Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither OEC Graphics company nor A Better Image Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither OEC Graphics company nor A Better Image Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither OEC Graphics company nor A Better Image Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A Better Image Printing company nor OEC Graphics company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A Better Image Printing nor OEC Graphics holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A Better Image Printing company nor OEC Graphics company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

OEC Graphics company employs more people globally than A Better Image Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither A Better Image Printing nor OEC Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A Better Image Printing nor OEC Graphics holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A Better Image Printing nor OEC Graphics holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A Better Image Printing nor OEC Graphics holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A Better Image Printing nor OEC Graphics holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A Better Image Printing nor OEC Graphics holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References