Comparison Overview

a+b furniture

VS

Falcon

a+b furniture

Unit 7 W+G Industrial Estate, Wantage, Oxfordshire, OX12 9TF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ab-furniture.co.uk/

a+b furniture is a family business set in the Oxfordshire countryside, dedicated to creating beautiful handmade furniture and homeware. We make furniture to commission for both homes and businesses, with each bespoke piece tailored to our customer’s requirements. We also have our own range of contemporary homeware, available to purchase through our online shop.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Falcon

810 W Highway 25 70, Newport, Tennessee, 37821, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.falconproducts.com

For 50 years, Falcon Products has been the go to resource for designers, architects and facility managers interested in high-quality table and seating products. Part of CFGroup’s portfolio of commercial furniture brands, Falcon Products serves a wide variety of clients, including those in the corporate, education, government and healthcare markets, and specializes in two areas of interior space management: community and collaboration areas. All products can be customized with very low minimum requirements, providing designers the exact solution they require. Falcon Products offers an extensive portfolio of customizable furniture to match all designs, color schemes and functionality requirements. With more than 150 different finishes, 350 fabric options and 300 products – including tables, chairs, booths and barstools – Falcon Products can deliver complete package solutions so clients are sure to find furnishings to fit every unique project and budget.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-b-furniture.jpeg
a+b furniture
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falcon-products.jpeg
Falcon
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
a+b furniture
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Falcon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for a+b furniture in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Falcon in 2025.

Incident History — a+b furniture (X = Date, Y = Severity)

a+b furniture cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Falcon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Falcon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-b-furniture.jpeg
a+b furniture
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/falcon-products.jpeg
Falcon
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

a+b furniture company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Falcon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Falcon company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to a+b furniture company.

In the current year, Falcon company and a+b furniture company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Falcon company nor a+b furniture company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Falcon company nor a+b furniture company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Falcon company nor a+b furniture company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither a+b furniture company nor Falcon company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither a+b furniture nor Falcon holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither a+b furniture company nor Falcon company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Falcon company employs more people globally than a+b furniture company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither a+b furniture nor Falcon holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither a+b furniture nor Falcon holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither a+b furniture nor Falcon holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither a+b furniture nor Falcon holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither a+b furniture nor Falcon holds HIPAA certification.

Neither a+b furniture nor Falcon holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References