Comparison Overview

A-1 Graphic Solutions

VS

Graffic Traffic Company

A-1 Graphic Solutions

1200 Garden City Hwy, Midland, TX, 79702, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Along with sign manufacturing, A-1 Graphic Solutions specializes in distributing FRC, PPE, Embroidery and ASI product offerings. A-1 Sign Engravers Inc. is a true “one stop” shop for Oil and Gas producers and suppliers. A-1 Sign Engravers Inc. is one of the nation’s largest sign manufactures servicing the Oil and Gas industry for over 40 years. We use cutting edge technology along with old school knowhow to produce the highest quality engraved or silkscreened signs and decals in the industry. We also service wholesale needs for signage organizations requesting the highest level of manufacturing in their engraved sign products. 1973 - Founder Dave Tomlin started A-1 Sign in Midland, TX. engraving Oilfield Lease Signs on his kitchen table. 1975 - A-1 Sign moved to it's first commercial manufacturing building. Silk Screening was added as a method of sign manufacturing along w engraving. 1985 - A-1 Sign moved to it's current location 1200 Garden City Hwy Midland, TX. 1989 - A-1 Sign became A-1 Sign Engravers Inc. 1995 - A-1 Embroidery was founded. A-1 Distributors and Sign Supplies was founded. 1997 - Building was massively expanded to facilitate growing manufacturing, manufacturing technology and product offerings. 1998 - First automated Silk Screen presses were purchased for mass T-shirt silk screening. 2000 - A-1 Embroidery started offering promotional products. 2011 - A-1 Embroidery became A-1 FR Embroidery and started distributing FRC and PPE products. TODAY - One stop shop as, A-1 Graphic Solutions specializing in distributing FRC, PPE, Embroidery and ASI product offerings. A-1 is a true “one stop” shop for Oil and Gas producers and suppliers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Graffic Traffic Company

2275 Mcknight Rd. Suite 2, North St. Paul, Minnesota, 55109, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Graffic Traffic Celebrated its 31st year in business in 2022. We are a family-owned business located in North St. Paul, MN. We specialize helping our clients "put their brand in motion" with great promotional products and decorated garments. We also support them with in-house graphic design. Graffic Traffic works with all types of organizations, schools, churches, businesses, & special events.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-1-graphic-solutions.jpeg
A-1 Graphic Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffic-traffic-llc.jpeg
Graffic Traffic Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A-1 Graphic Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Graffic Traffic Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A-1 Graphic Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Graffic Traffic Company in 2025.

Incident History — A-1 Graphic Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A-1 Graphic Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Graffic Traffic Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Graffic Traffic Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a-1-graphic-solutions.jpeg
A-1 Graphic Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/graffic-traffic-llc.jpeg
Graffic Traffic Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both A-1 Graphic Solutions company and Graffic Traffic Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Graffic Traffic Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A-1 Graphic Solutions company.

In the current year, Graffic Traffic Company company and A-1 Graphic Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor A-1 Graphic Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor A-1 Graphic Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Graffic Traffic Company company nor A-1 Graphic Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions nor Graffic Traffic Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions company nor Graffic Traffic Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

A-1 Graphic Solutions company employs more people globally than Graffic Traffic Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions nor Graffic Traffic Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions nor Graffic Traffic Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions nor Graffic Traffic Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions nor Graffic Traffic Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions nor Graffic Traffic Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A-1 Graphic Solutions nor Graffic Traffic Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N