Comparison Overview

A&A Graphic Dies & Design

VS

Sandy Alexander

A&A Graphic Dies & Design

2197 Irvindale Drive, Chamblee, GA, 30341, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

The philosophy of A&A Graphic Dies is to provide the highest quality and the best service while using the latest in technology. Lasers, automated benders, waterjets, cnc routers, cnc mills and our commitment to customer service allow us to turn most dies the same day as ordered. We take pride in our dies. Our products consist of laser steel rule dies, copper engraving dies for foil stamping and embossing, brass cnc dies, thin plate cutting dies, custom cutting services such as cnc routing, cnc laser and waterjet, and make ready supplies for foil stamping, embossing and die cutting. Exceeding your expectations is our goal. We currently serve the printing, packaging, label, foam, p.o.p display and gasket industries. We make dies on your schedule, not ours. All of your die-making needs from just one company. Our goal is to provide an exceptional experience with every order. A&a makes customer service our top priority and follows the golden rule by treating our customers the way we would want to be treated. We want our customers to feel special whether it’s through friendly hassle-free service, providing one-day dies, or one hour quotes.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sandy Alexander

200 Entin Road, Clifton, NJ, 07014, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

We are a brand experience company. On a mission to help our partners create new levels of real-life consumer connection. Commercial Print – Direct Mail – Wide Format – Visual Experience – Fulfillment – Technology. Using the following four guiding principles, we have built lasting relationships with our clients: • One Source: We pride ourselves on providing a single contact point for all development, production, fulfillment and delivery, essentially handling any project from start-to-finish. • Color Science: Our world-class color scientist is able to go beyond the G7 certification, printing across all substrates and platforms while continually providing color consistency in every project. • Marketing Technology: By providing advanced marketing technologies, we utilize data-driven marketing and marketing automation strategies to reach multi-channel marketing solutions that yield record-breaking response rates. • Sustainable Intelligence: Leading and inspiring our industry in sustainable practices, we run on 100% wind power energy and have been ISO 14001 and Sustainable Green Printer (SGP) certified, as well as tri-certified for chain-of-custody sustainable paper (FSC, SFI, PEFC).

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 296
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a&a-graphic-dies-&-design.jpeg
A&A Graphic Dies & Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandy-alexander.jpeg
Sandy Alexander
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A&A Graphic Dies & Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sandy Alexander
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A&A Graphic Dies & Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sandy Alexander in 2025.

Incident History — A&A Graphic Dies & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A&A Graphic Dies & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sandy Alexander (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sandy Alexander cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/a&a-graphic-dies-&-design.jpeg
A&A Graphic Dies & Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sandy-alexander.jpeg
Sandy Alexander
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sandy Alexander company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A&A Graphic Dies & Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sandy Alexander company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to A&A Graphic Dies & Design company.

In the current year, Sandy Alexander company and A&A Graphic Dies & Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sandy Alexander company nor A&A Graphic Dies & Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sandy Alexander company nor A&A Graphic Dies & Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sandy Alexander company nor A&A Graphic Dies & Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design company nor Sandy Alexander company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design nor Sandy Alexander holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design company nor Sandy Alexander company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sandy Alexander company employs more people globally than A&A Graphic Dies & Design company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design nor Sandy Alexander holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design nor Sandy Alexander holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design nor Sandy Alexander holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design nor Sandy Alexander holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design nor Sandy Alexander holds HIPAA certification.

Neither A&A Graphic Dies & Design nor Sandy Alexander holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L