FlexBooker
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 700 and 749
FlexBooker is a company based out of United States.
NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Comparison Overview
FlexBooker
VS
Meta
Meta
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 700 and 749
Meta's mission is to build the future of human connection and the technology that makes it possible. Our technologies help people connect, find communities, and grow businesses. When Facebook launched in 2004, it changed the way people connect. Apps like Messenger, Instagram and WhatsApp further empowered billions around the world. Now, Meta is moving beyond 2D screens toward immersive experiences like augmented and virtual reality to help build the next evolution in social technology. To help create a safe and respectful online space, we encourage constructive conversations on this page. Please note the following: • Start with an open mind. Whether you agree or disagree, engage with empathy. • Comments violating our Community Standards will be removed or hidden. Please treat everybody with respect. • Keep it constructive. Use your interactions here to learn about and grow your understanding of others. • Our moderators are here to uphold these guidelines for the benefit of everyone, every day. • If you are seeking support for issues related to your Facebook account, please reference our Help Center (https://www.facebook.com/help) or Help Community (https://www.facebook.com/help/community). For a full listing of our jobs, visit https://www.metacareers.com
NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 146,293
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
14
Attack type number
4
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
FlexBooker
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Meta
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
FlexBooker
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Meta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for FlexBooker in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)
Meta has 30.56% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History — FlexBooker (X = Date, Y = Severity)
FlexBooker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Meta (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Meta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
FlexBooker
Incidents
Meta
Incidents
Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing Email
Motivation: Identity Fraud, Data Theft, Scam Distribution
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: API Vulnerability Exploitation, Third-Party Scraping
Motivation: Data Exfiltration for Financial Gain, Identity Theft, Phishing Campaigns
Blog: Blog
Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unsafe deserialization of payloads
Motivation: Exploitation for remote code execution, potential data exfiltration, and botnet integration
Blog: Blog
FAQ
FlexBooker company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Meta company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
Meta company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to FlexBooker company.
In the current year, Meta company has reported more cyber incidents than FlexBooker company.
Neither Meta company nor FlexBooker company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Meta company has disclosed at least one data breach, while FlexBooker company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Both Meta company and FlexBooker company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.
Meta company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while FlexBooker company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither FlexBooker nor Meta holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Meta company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FlexBooker company.
Meta company employs more people globally than FlexBooker company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.
Neither FlexBooker nor Meta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither FlexBooker nor Meta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither FlexBooker nor Meta holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither FlexBooker nor Meta holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither FlexBooker nor Meta holds HIPAA certification.
Neither FlexBooker nor Meta holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description
A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.
Description
A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.
Description
A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.
