Comparison Overview

9 Impressions

VS

Leterme Dowling

9 Impressions

Units 42-50, London, England, N7 8EL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

We London design agency helping brands with big ideas. As part of Mayfield Press, we're creative, collaborative and combine over 35 years of industry experience with strong project management skills to produce excellent designs using our in-house studio. Our multi-disciplinary team can handle projects from inception right through to completion, with expertise in international adaptation, art direction, design, print production and distribution to anywhere in the world. We specialise in advertising, brand consistency, direct mail, corporate identity and point of sale, together with budget and schedule management.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Leterme Dowling

Leterme Dowling,, Norwich, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Leterme Dowling is a multi-disciplinary design studio with a global client base. We pride ourselves on our individual approach to design across a variety of applications; from logos, websites, promotional literature and identity systems, to brochures, packaging and signage. We work on projects of all scales, place an emphasis on giving each project our collective commitment and on working closely and openly with clients from the outset. We believe this can make the difference in creating appropriate and distinctive graphic design that not only communicates but also engages its audience.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/9-impressions-ltd.jpeg
9 Impressions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leterme-dowling.jpeg
Leterme Dowling
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
9 Impressions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Leterme Dowling
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 9 Impressions in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leterme Dowling in 2025.

Incident History — 9 Impressions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

9 Impressions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Leterme Dowling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leterme Dowling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/9-impressions-ltd.jpeg
9 Impressions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leterme-dowling.jpeg
Leterme Dowling
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Leterme Dowling company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to 9 Impressions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Leterme Dowling company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 9 Impressions company.

In the current year, Leterme Dowling company and 9 Impressions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Leterme Dowling company nor 9 Impressions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Leterme Dowling company nor 9 Impressions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Leterme Dowling company nor 9 Impressions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 9 Impressions company nor Leterme Dowling company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 9 Impressions nor Leterme Dowling holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither 9 Impressions company nor Leterme Dowling company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

9 Impressions company employs more people globally than Leterme Dowling company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither 9 Impressions nor Leterme Dowling holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 9 Impressions nor Leterme Dowling holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 9 Impressions nor Leterme Dowling holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 9 Impressions nor Leterme Dowling holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 9 Impressions nor Leterme Dowling holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 9 Impressions nor Leterme Dowling holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X