Comparison Overview

7BR

VS

Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter

7BR

7 Bedford Row, London, undefined, WC1R 4BS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

7BR is a leading multi-disciplinary set of Barristers’ Chambers. Founded in 1956 at 2 Crown Office Row, in the early 1990s Chambers was one of the first sets to move out of the Temple and purchase premises in Bedford Row. 7 Bedford Row now offers modern facilities, including a spacious seminar suite, state of the art conference rooms, and comfortable space for joint settlement meetings and arbitrations. As an established set with 94 Members (including 18 King’s Counsel) 7BR is a leading set in the fields of Clinical Negligence, Group Litigation and Personal Injury, and is recognised as a significant force in Family and Child Law, Serious Crime, Financial Crime, Offshore and International Disputes, Employment Law, and Inquests and Inquiries. Our aim is to provide excellence in legal advice, advocacy before Courts and Tribunals, and in our service to professional and lay clients. For a full list of our specialisms, please head to Chambers' website here: https://www.7br.co.uk/legal-expertise We are a set that promotes equality, diversity and inclusivity among both Members and staff, and is fully committed to equal access to justice for all.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter

The Shard, London, SE1 9SG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter exists to provide IP resources and services specifically for smaller businesses such as startups and scaleups. We recognise the energy and passion that is put into these business' products and offerings, and often feel that that same energy and passion hasn't traditionally been reflected well enough in the professional legal support provided. We want to provide IP services that are as dynamic and energetic as the businesses themselves; adding value and supporting them as they grow. @mathyssquirescaleup

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/7-bedford-row-chambers.jpeg
7BR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mathyssquirescaleup.jpeg
Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
7BR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 7BR in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter in 2025.

Incident History — 7BR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

7BR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/7-bedford-row-chambers.jpeg
7BR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mathyssquirescaleup.jpeg
Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both 7BR company and Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to 7BR company.

In the current year, Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter company and 7BR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter company nor 7BR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter company nor 7BR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter company nor 7BR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither 7BR company nor Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither 7BR nor Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to 7BR company.

Neither 7BR nor Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither 7BR nor Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither 7BR nor Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither 7BR nor Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither 7BR nor Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter holds HIPAA certification.

Neither 7BR nor Mathys & Squire Scaleup Quarter holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X